Re: gEDA-user: PCB file syntax

2010-10-20 Thread DJ Delorie
> Well, there's section 8.9 and there's section 8.10. Err, right ;-) > Section 8.10 claims to be PCBFlags, that is, (AFAICS) the flags that are > located in the top-level "Flags" directive as described in 8.8.10. But > both, 8.8.10 and 8.10, talk only about numeric flags, while the directive > q

gEDA-user: gnetlist returns errors for wires i can't find

2010-10-20 Thread jedmartin
i have put together an 8 page schematic, and i've taken care of all of the DRC2 errors except for 4 errors relating to a pair of wires i can't find in the schematic... Checking nets with only one connection... ERROR: Net 'unnamed_net177' has no connections. ERROR: Net 'unnamed_net176' has no connec

Re: gEDA-user: PCB file syntax

2010-10-20 Thread Josef Wolf
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 07:54:46PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: Thanks for your answer, DJ! > > But current versions emit something like > > > > Flags("rubberband,clearnew,snappin") > > > > Maybe a more up-to-date description of the flags exist somewhere out there? > > Section 8.9 describes the

Re: gEDA-user: ngspice - problem with AC current source

2010-10-20 Thread Fabio
Le 19 oct. 2010 à 18:53, John Doty a écrit : > > On Oct 19, 2010, at 5:46 AM, Fabio wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have a simple transimpedance circuit, like this (It's an AOP with a single >> resistor) : >> http://bit.ly/bhGCeB (.gif) >> >> Since the transimpedance inverts the current, I'm putt

Re: gEDA-user: gschem symbol question

2010-10-20 Thread kai-martin knaak
Gabriele Di Nucci wrote: > I've recently started using gEDA/gschem and I don't understand > why the symbols are so big? This really is a FAQ: http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq-gschem#why_are_symbols_so_big If we ever get around to rebuild a better default library, then frames should be renamed