Hi,
kai-martin knaak wrote:
When creating a multiple purpose HF connector footprint pcb refused
to place vias close to each other. The trigger for refusal seems
to be overlapping annulus.
Reported three years ago:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1687692&group_id=73743&atid=5388
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:19 +0100, sibu xolo wrote:
>> I have been trying to compile the program gwave (from svn )
>
> gwave is one of the most demanding tools of geda suite, for building
> from sources. In my opinion, if your goal is to c
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:59 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> Moin.
>
> When creating a multiple purpose HF connector footprint pcb refused
> to place vias close to each other. The trigger for refusal seems
> to be overlapping annulus. However, I see no strong hardware reason
> to second guess me whe
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 22:58 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> It's in the usual place :-)
>
Fine work, many bugs from 2009 snapshot seems to be removed.
While preparing the gentoo ebuild there is still one strange thing: When
I test the toporouter I get files like
surface0.gts
surface1.gts
surface2.gt
Moin.
When creating a multiple purpose HF connector footprint pcb refused
to place vias close to each other. The trigger for refusal seems
to be overlapping annulus. However, I see no strong hardware reason
to second guess me where I want to put a via. As long as the holes
themselves don't overlap
Jan Martinek wrote:
> 4) Use #1 but do some manual post-processing.
>disadvantage: At any change in the schematics the manual work
>must be done again.
You don't need to restart routing all over if the changes in the
schematic are only gradual. In fact, I never do. With my hand routed
l
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 01:49:57PM -0400, Rick Collins wrote:
> No, I am not suggesting #2. You don't want to reroute the design
> after you add the jumpers. Once you have a routed design, add the
> jumper pads to the layout so that wires can be added to the bottom
> of the board to complete the
No, I am not suggesting #2. You don't want to reroute the design
after you add the jumpers. Once you have a routed design, add the
jumper pads to the layout so that wires can be added to the bottom of
the board to complete the unrouted connections. Then use back
annotation to update the sche
Hi,
no, it really does not work. I think you are suggesting #2. The
autorouter is unpredictable. If I change anything in the schematics, the
autorouter comes with different design, often worse than before with
more unresolved rat lines. Adding a jumper in schematics does not result
into reduc
I'm not sure I understand the problem with #1. Can't you take the
mostly routed design and back annotate the jumpers so that they are
parts in the original schematic? Then you get what you are looking
for in #3 which you think is the best approach.
Rick
At 12:17 PM 10/16/2010, you wrote:
H
Hello,
I am trying to design a single-sided board with SMD components only (no
drilling). The toporouter (which is absolutely awesome, btw.) routes
almost all rat lines with only several left unresolved. But, what now? I
can do several things:
1) Make the PCB and connect suitable places with
Am 10.10.2010 10:03, schrieb Felix Ruoff:
Am 10.10.2010 02:55, schrieb Peter Clifton:
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 23:29 +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote:
(...)
The first one (0002...) removes some unused functions from the
gtk-gui-code.
How is removing APIs required by the HID interface and replacing th
12 matches
Mail list logo
