Hi, Bert;
On 9/30/10, Bert Timmerman wrote:
> Hmm, g_key_file_* and friends arrived at GTK version 2.6.
>
> AFAICT, configure.ac checks for the GTK version to be at least 2.8.0, so all
> gtk functions prior to that version (and not deprecated) should be
> reasonable safe to use.
2.4.0, to be pre
It's in the usual place :-)
If someone can get the mingw builds working again, I'd appreciate that
- neither the win32/build_pcb script nor a fedora mingw cross compiler
work for me.
Let's not wait a year for the next release...
Note: I avoided the "what letter comes after 'z'" problem by simp
You are a little shy of providing info. It is an STX-35398A part and
is a very odd critter. But I understand it now. The drawing you
provided has inaccuracies in it. They appear to show the cutout
pushing to the rectangular pins. In believe in reality they only
require a single rectangular
DJ Delorie wrote:
>> Outline layer? How would I edit that?
>
> Add another copper layer, change the name to "outline"
>
The purpose of the outline layer is to communicate non rectangular
pcb shapes to the fab. See
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:pcb_tips#how_do_i_make_a_board_outline_to_go_with
Dave Kinney wrote:
> I know who I have to use a full service company. I just need to know
> how to make them in pcb. The company wants gerber files.
When I needed a square cutout, my fab just required me to provide the
exact borders. So I drew the outline of the hole in the outline layer.
A not
Felix Ruoff wrote:
> My idea is to store the filter from last using of the dialog and use
> this filter again.
+1.
I was about to suggest this kind of automatic adaption to user
preferences, when I read your mail :-)
> The filter at the first launch of pcb after the
> installation should be
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Personally, I like the filtered list to be the default, but only if
> there's an easy way to unfilter it. And if it always chooses the
> right filter :-)
A bad example is the file dialog in gschem. It always filters for *.sch
files. However, gschem is also the symbol editor.
> Outline layer? How would I edit that?
Add another copper layer, change the name to "outline"
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Outlone layer? How would I edit that?
On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> PCB's footprint format doesn't support cutouts like that. Your best
> bet is to have silk lines for where the cutout should be, and just
> edit your ouline layer to be what you need.
>
>
> __
I know who I have to use a full service company. I just need to know how to
make them in pcb. The company wants gerber files.
On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:18 PM, Mark Rages wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Rick Collins wrote:
>> I'm not sure what to make of this part. If this is the only
PCB's footprint format doesn't support cutouts like that. Your best
bet is to have silk lines for where the cutout should be, and just
edit your ouline layer to be what you need.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/
> Let's see what comments the pcb-devs have on your patch ;-)
Personally, I like the filtered list to be the default, but only if
there's an easy way to unfilter it. And if it always chooses the
right filter :-)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@m
Yes it's supposed to mount there. I need to know how to make the cutout for it
to sit in place. I can get you a link for the PDF. As I said I'm confined for
space. It's a kycon stx-35398...
On Sep 29, 2010, at 7:57 PM, timecop wrote:
> I was going to reply something about "why are you linkin
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Rick Collins wrote:
> I'm not sure what to make of this part. If this is the only info you have
> on this part, I wouldn't use it until I get one in hand. It looks to me
> like this is intended for the body of the part to sit in the plane of the
> board with pins
I was going to reply something about "why are you linking to some
stupid flash website with a jpeg on it instead of .pdf off
manufacturer's website" but then I thought audio jacks are serious
business and he's probably not allowed to disclose any more
information than this under a NDA.
-tc
On Thu
I'm not sure what to make of this part. If this is the only info you
have on this part, I wouldn't use it until I get one in hand. It
looks to me like this is intended for the body of the part to sit in
the plane of the board with pins along the edges. Notice the drawing
shows the edge of th
At 07:00 PM 9/29/2010, you wrote:
Rick Collins wrote:
The point I wanted to make is, that there's nothing wrong with our
memories but
that the 2009 version of IPC-7351 contradicts the 2005 version
(probably 2003 as I see now),
maybe in order to conform to EIAJ/ANSI 481C. So this conformance
sh
http://www.box.net/shared/3axnnkflhe
That is the link. I'm not too worried about cost. I'm really wondering how to
create the footprint that has the cutout in it.
On Sep 29, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Rick Collins wrote:
> What link?
>
> In general, rectangular openings are not well received by the PW
What link?
In general, rectangular openings are not well received by the PWB
maker. If they are large enough (somewhere in the range of 0.1 or
0.2 inches wide or more) they can be routed, but that often costs a
bit more. A small rectangular pin is typically accommodated by
notching the edge
Rick Collins wrote:
The point I wanted to make is, that there's nothing wrong with our
memories but
that the 2009 version of IPC-7351 contradicts the 2005 version
(probably 2003 as I see now),
maybe in order to conform to EIAJ/ANSI 481C. So this conformance
should be veryfied.
Do you have a c
Hi,
im designing something using a 3.5mm audio jack that is space confined,
i need to use a jack that mounts in the middle of the circuit board.
unfortunatly i cant figure out how to make the cutout in the footprint
or the rectangular(with circular ends) pins. the link is a picture o
Many thanks for clarifications!
>
> Activate "New polygons are full ones" in the settings menu to disable
> removal of islands for new polygons. For existing polgons you can add
> the fullpoly flag in a text editor.
>
> Note to Peter Clifton: This does not work in the OpenGL enables
> versi
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Gareth Edwards <> wrote:
> Hi Chitlesh
>
> On 28 September 2010 19:03, Chitlesh GOORAH <> wrote:
>> You can find the slides on http://www.tandvsolns.co.uk/downloads/
>
> Would you mind if I re-presented your slideset to our Hackerspace
> (below in .sig)? I'm sure mo
Hi Felix,
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Felix Ruoff
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:24 AM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Change default file-filter in open-dialo
Anyone here going to this event?:
http://www.globalsmt.net/smt/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11580&Itemid=396
See Kyzen’s Rich Brooks Discuss "Concerns in Cleaning Under Low
Profile Components at SMTAI 2010"
SMTA International, scheduled to take place October 25-28, 2010 at the
Wa
At 08:38 AM 9/29/2010, you wrote:
Hi,
Rick Collins wrote:
At 04:53 PM 9/28/2010, you wrote:
For all those, that follow the discussion from here or vaguely
remember some other rotations:
Rick Collins wrote:
I had to go through all this some time ago and recently I wanted
to iron out all the
Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Ko=C5=9Bciuszkiewicz?= wrote:
> It seems in Peter's pcb branch ps export does not work as intended.
>
> For a 2-layer board both front and back copper layers are exported
> twice, as indicated by console output during export. When using
> multifile export the *.front.ps and *
> > No, actually, an attribute is required to have a value,
>
> There seems to be no good design reason for this restriction: an
> empty string is still a perfectly good string, just as zero is a
> perfectly good number.
I agree, this caused me problems during the final phases of my last
board -
Kai-Martin Knaak:
> Karl Hammar wrote:
...
> >> 6, add some kind of GUI control to activate/deactivate rules
> > Gui things are for others to contribute with, but maybe if we could
> > make drc2 react on some attributes?
> How about an attribute to the connecting net to silence drc2 at this
> spe
On Sep 29, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Patrick Bernaud wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Doty writes:
>> [...]
>> This is a coding error somewhere. There should be nothing wrong with an
>> empty string as an attribute: it's a perfectly good string.
>
> No, actually, an attribute is required to have a value,
T
Kai-Martin Knaak:
> Karl Hammar wrote:
> >> 4, add explicit documentation on the rules in the wiki
> > I'm not the wiki man. I could read the code (I assume you mean drc2)
> > and try to describe it in text, but someone else has to enter it
> > into the wiki.
> Ok, if you describe the rules here o
Hi,
Rick Collins wrote:
At 04:53 PM 9/28/2010, you wrote:
For all those, that follow the discussion from here or vaguely
remember some other rotations:
Rick Collins wrote:
I had to go through all this some time ago and recently I wanted to
iron out all the difficulties so that the assembly h
Kai-Martin Knaak:
> Karl Hammar wrote:
> >> 5, add a tutorial on how to adapt the DRC rules to the local needs
> Well documented examples would take me a long way.
Ok, I'll use http://turkos/git/openhw/wascator_c240/styrkort.sch as an
example.
*
How to tell drc2 which tests to skip:
$ gn
John Doty:
> On Sep 28, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
> > In gnet-drc2.scm:
> > ;; Example:
> > ;; (define dont-check-non-numbered-parts 1)
...
> > and there is also descriptions how to alter what is allowed to
> > connect to what in the file. The problem seems to get that inside
> >
> > g
Thomas Dean writes:
> I have an application which causes a seg fault in gnetlist. I think
> this can be fixed by changing the schematic. But, Segmentation fault
> is NEVER the proper response.
Your issue is similar to bug #3032626 (a malformed attribute as
Kai-Martin explained). I have propos
Hi John,
John Doty writes:
> [...]
> This is a coding error somewhere. There should be nothing wrong with an
> empty string as an attribute: it's a perfectly good string.
No, actually, an attribute is required to have a value, see
documentation (and code) for o_attrib_string_get_name_value()
Hi Bert,
Bert Timmerman wrote:
Commit message says it all:
Apply filters to load filechooser dialogs. [1988982] [2686963]
Applies filters to the filechooser dialogs when loading layouts,
layouts (to buffer), elements (to buffer) and netlists.
Default behaviour is to not fi
37 matches
Mail list logo
