I vaguely recall someone having a repository containing the bleeding edge
of the gEDA suite. Does such a beast exist?
--
David Griffith
dgri...@cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is t
http://www.delorie.com/electronics/hdd_clock/
Note that the top layer is missing a chunk near C2. It seems to have
placed it rotated 180 degrees around that pin.
It's OK in postscript and gui
It's BAD in gerber and png
___
geda-user mailing list
ge
I think I got it right, but would someone please double-check this
footprint for a Bourns 3386P trimpot for me? See
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/david_griffith/footprints/POT_BOURNS_3386P.fp
--
David Griffith
dgri...@cs.csubak.edu
___
geda-use
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:15:33 +0100, sibu xolo wrote:
> Making all in src
> make[3]: Entering directory `$SOURCES/geda-gaf-1.6.1/libgeda/src'
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile g++ -m64 -fPIC -
It looks like you're compiling with g++. This doesn't seem right to me...
Pet
> I found that unlike gsch2pcb import did not remove footprints of deleted
> components from the existing layout. Is this deliberate? Or is it just a
> feature to be?
Deliberate. All elements that shouldn't be there are selected, so you
can hit "Delete" to delete them, or not.
> If I changed
I believe the mark is the place that click when you copy to the paste buffer.
Steve
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
wrote:
>
> more import experience:
>
> I found that unlike gsch2pcb import did not remove footprints of deleted
> components from the existing layout. Is this del
CAM350
On 10 Aug 2010 22:53, "Stefan Tauner"
<[1]stefan.tau...@student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> hi
>
> i have different pcbs, that i want to submit to a manufacturer, that
> allows "nutzen"/tiled pcbs.
> dj wrote some scripts to do this (pcb2panel etc. see
> [2]http://www.
hi
i have different pcbs, that i want to submit to a manufacturer, that
allows "nutzen"/tiled pcbs.
dj wrote some scripts to do this (pcb2panel etc. see
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/dj_delorie/). but those trigger a pcb
bug, when i rotate some of the outlined pcbs when calling panel2pcb
(and wh
more import experience:
I found that unlike gsch2pcb import did not remove footprints of deleted
components from the existing layout. Is this deliberate? Or is it just a
feature to be?
If I changed a symbol in gschem with the multi attribute editor and saved
without unselecting the just edite
Dear gEDA-users,
I am new to this list. I searched the gEDA mailing lists and archives and I
hope I am on the correct list -(the dev list is by invitation only)
If I am not I would be grateful for guidance.
---Now I am trying to compile gEDAgaf on a computer with the following
features:
During my trial runs I noted, that the import prefers the default library
for footprints that have the same file name. But most of the time I want my
local footprints.
Is there a way to make import ignore the default library? With gsch2pcb I
achieve this feat with (reset-source-library) in the
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Yes please, with "git format-patch" if you can.
Here you go. I tried to follow the recipe in
http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:scm#format_a_patch_to_send_to_the_developers
Hope, I didn't mess it.
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak tel:
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:19:25 +0200
Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Maybe your grouping concept should occur in an early stage in gschem?
One of the commercial PCB program I worked with had the feature of defining
color for nets. Such as D? is red, A? is blue. It was very good to work with.
So a regular
13 matches
Mail list logo
