Does anybody know if it's possible to compile gnetlist (and its
dependency libgeda) without gtk? From the source, it looks like
gnetlist should compile fine, but libgeda has quite a few gdk
references that I would have to remove. I'm trying to use gnetlist on
a headless Gentoo server, and I'd ra
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:53:42 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> In gpleda.org the tools page lists "documentation" as one of the core
> tools of geda/gaf: http://www.gpleda.org/tools/index.html This item
> links to a page that merely says "under construction"
> http://www.gpleda.org/tools/
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:04:42 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>I don't "think" PCB has a mailing list for bug traffic.
>
> It does now:
>
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pcb-bugs
BTW, the mailing list software of the various geda lists,
mailman, does not need a root server. So, like bu
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:04:16 -0800, Jared Casper wrote:
> But revisiting the
> topic once every year or so doesn't seem too bad, what was true then may
> not still be true.
One of the truths of yesteryear has changed: Bugzilla now integrates with git
http://www.theoldmonk.net/blog/archives/2010/
John Doty wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:11 AM, Joerg wrote:
If for some reason gEDA doesn't allow to switch to another refdes letter inside the schematic
(which would be sort of strange because of differing preferences in various countries) you'd have
to make a new part, then set it's refdes l
On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:11 AM, Joerg wrote:
> If for some reason gEDA doesn't allow to switch to another refdes letter
> inside the schematic (which would be sort of strange because of differing
> preferences in various countries) you'd have to make a new part, then set
> it's refdes letter to "
Phil Frost wrote:
I'm trying to simulate my first nontrivial circuit with ngspice. The
circuit in question is a discrete MOSFET driver. I wasn't able to find
any spice models for the power MOSFETs I'm using (Ixys IXTP200N055T2),
but I was able to find something from Fairchild for a similar device
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:11:08 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
>> fwiw, there is a pcb-bugs mailing list with only me as the subscriber.
>> Of course in all fairness, that list didn't exist yesterday ;) That
>> list will get all new bug reports and updates to existing reports.
>
> Don't see it listed at
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> We (Peter C & I) try quite hard to keep on top of patches to gschem/libgeda
> etc., y'know. Putting them in the tracker makes things a lot easier for us,
> and I really encourage you to keep doing that.
>
Sorry, didn't mean to diminish yo
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 20:26:41 Jared Casper wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Alberto Maccioni
>
> wrote:
> > This:
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=73743&atid=538813
> >
> > which is also linked from:
> > http://www.gpleda.org/developer.html
>
> Ah yes... unfortunatel
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Alberto Maccioni
wrote:
> This:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=73743&atid=538813
>
> which is also linked from:
> http://www.gpleda.org/developer.html
>
Ah yes... unfortunately, at present, "Sourceforge is where patches go
to die"*. I've had more suc
This:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=73743&atid=538813
which is also linked from:
http://www.gpleda.org/developer.html
2010/3/10 Ethan Swint :
> Yes - but what is the function!?! (A,B,C; 1,2,3 please.)
>
> On 03/10/2010 03:07 PM, Alberto Maccioni wrote:
>>
>> I called it a procedure, b
On Mar 10, 2010, at 4:24 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
Solder mask aperture is important as well as pad size, since the
stencil
opening probably ought never include areas which are solder-masked. It
is possible (although I'm not sure how useful) to set a partially
masked
pad - perhaps as some ki
Yes - but what is the function!?! (A,B,C; 1,2,3 please.)
On 03/10/2010 03:07 PM, Alberto Maccioni wrote:
I called it a procedure, but it's the fact that there is a submit
patch function; it's so obvious to any developer that it's not written
anywhere.
And I didn't notice it until very recently.
I called it a procedure, but it's the fact that there is a submit
patch function; it's so obvious to any developer that it's not written
anywhere.
And I didn't notice it until very recently.
2010/3/10 Jared Casper :
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Alberto Maccioni
> wrote:
>> the code on the
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
>I don't "think" PCB has a mailing list for bug traffic.
It does now:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pcb-bugs
Dan set it up a couple days ago.
Long ago there was a PCB specific list but I've not seen any messages
on it in *year
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:12:20 +, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
>> It's been discussed before.
>>
>> http://archives.seul.org/geda/dev/Oct-2008/msg00139.html
Oh yeah, I remember reading that now, thanks. :) But revisiting the
topic once eve
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:12:20 +, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> It's been discussed before.
>
> http://archives.seul.org/geda/dev/Oct-2008/msg00139.html
Before I read the whole thread: What was the upshot of this discussion?
---<(kaimartin)>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:15:41 -0800, Jared Casper
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
>> Or - in my ideal word, can we just dump the crappy sourceforge bug
>> trackers and switch to Launchpad??? (Pretty please).
>>
>
> What are the chances of installing something like fl
I'm trying to simulate my first nontrivial circuit with ngspice. The
circuit in question is a discrete MOSFET driver. I wasn't able to find
any spice models for the power MOSFETs I'm using (Ixys IXTP200N055T2),
but I was able to find something from Fairchild for a similar device,
FDP032N08.
The tr
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Or - in my ideal word, can we just dump the crappy sourceforge bug
> trackers and switch to Launchpad??? (Pretty please).
>
What are the chances of installing something like flyspray, bugzilla,
or even redmine or trac, on gpleda.org? Would t
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Alberto Maccioni
wrote:
> the code on the mailing list, but it took me several months to
> discover the "submit patch" procedure.
What procedure did you find?
Jared
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Dan McMahill wrote:
> Here's an example of a place where extra help wouldn't have needed any
> knowledge of internals. Over the years there have been various bug reports
> about some of the footprints that ship with pcb. For each of those, the
> process becomes
>
On Mar 10, 2010, at 4:24 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> Questions though..
>
> What to do with a manually defined paste layer if the user fiddles with
> the size of the copper pad / solder mask? (Assuming that eventually
> becomes more flexible to edit).
? I don't think I understand the question.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:13:16AM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > Indeed, however how hard would it be to add a "nopaste" flag to a pad
> > to indicate that you don't want paste for this specific pad?
>
> Only as hard as running the ChangePaste() action.
I wasn't aware of its existence.
I totally agree with you (as a new user interested in developing).
2010/3/10 Alberto Maccioni <[1]alberto.macci...@gmail.com>
I submitted a patch for PCB about a month ago and it has been
reviewed
these days; is this too much delay?
Probably not, but now I read that incl
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:02 AM, John Luciani wrote:
> I was thinking of a post-processing script.
>
> For each footprint you would look up to see if there was a corresponding
> stencil
> footprint (maybe a .sfp file). If there was that would be used. If not
> then a rule would be applied to cre
> Indeed, however how hard would it be to add a "nopaste" flag to a pad
> to indicate that you don't want paste for this specific pad?
Only as hard as running the ChangePaste() action.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.se
> Indeed, however how hard would it be to add a "nopaste" flag to a pad
> to indicate that you don't want paste for this specific pad?
Only as hard as running the ChangePaste() action.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.se
I was thinking of a post-processing script.
For each footprint you would look up to see if there was a corresponding stencil
footprint (maybe a .sfp file). If there was that would be used. If not
then a rule would be applied to create the pattern. You could have
specific rules for groups of compon
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 16:54 -0800, Dave N6NZ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:01 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
is that true? Is it simply generated on the fly off the pad
information during gerber export?
That's true.
I have no idea how to add a
layer and do all the necessary updat
I submitted a patch for PCB about a month ago and it has been reviewed
these days; is this too much delay?
Probably not, but now I read that including tests would have made the
reviewing job easier and possibly shorter.
But I didn't even know of the existence of such tests: the point is
that to the
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 07:56:42PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> One of my long-term projects is to add layer types to layers, and
> allow for sub-circuits (i.e. elements). Then we'd have a true paste
> layer, and you could define elements as complexly as you need.
>
> But it's been on the list f
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:33:11PM +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 18:27 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
> > pstoedit converts postscript to various formats. So I suppose you could
> > try pcb export to postscript and then pstoedit to produce dxf. That
> > said, there are always
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 16:54 -0800, Dave N6NZ wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:01 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> >
> >> is that true? Is it simply generated on the fly off the pad
> >> information during gerber export?
> >
> > That's true.
> Just in case anyone is confused by the tight snippage: It is t
35 matches
Mail list logo
