On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> For Gentoo we try to give users the freedom to suppress installation of
> documentation and examples.
If you delete the docs, then pay attention to gschem help menu. The
latter calls for the wiki. You will need to suppress that or patch
gsc
Hello there,
I wish to wire two pins by loading the .sch file by an automated
method, say a script.
Is there a way or did someone already has a script which wires two
known pins automatically ?
regards,
Chitlesh
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@mo
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 19:18 -0400, Vincent Onelli wrote:
> I apologies for my ignorance, I am not sure that I enter the info
> correctly. Here what I did: File -> Preference -> Library, then entered
> ~/geda/pcb-elements, which is my footprint directory but nothing has
> changed anywhere. I also f
> Hello,
> I have not found a good way to set up my library, that is footprint that
> I need to make. At the present time I made the following directory:
> ~/geda/project (for schematics layouts), ~/geda/pcb-elements (my
> creation), ~/geda/footprint (for footprints downloaded), all this work
> OK,
For Gentoo we try to give users the freedom to suppress installation of
documentation and examples.
Up to 1.4.3 this was easy -- just do not install the docs and examples
packages.
For 1.6 we seem to have still --disable-gattrib, but currently I am not
sure which is the best way to suppress docs
Hi Frank,
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 21:50 +, Frank Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:12:12 +0200, Bert Timmerman wrote:
>
> > PCB output for a "3D-view" in Blender (or AutoCAD if you live in the
> > "other" universe) is somewhere on the bottom of my todo list.
> >
> > To keep things decou
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:12:12 +0200, Bert Timmerman wrote:
> PCB output for a "3D-view" in Blender (or AutoCAD if you live in the
> "other" universe) is somewhere on the bottom of my todo list.
>
> To keep things decoupled from the pcb perspective ...
I would prefer this.
> ...I would suggest on
On Oct 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Bas Gieltjes wrote:
>
>
>> It would also be nice to have a configurable place for user gnetlist
>> scripts.
>
> Something like this?
> gnetlist -g where-geda-sh -p private-netlist.scm /dev/null -o
> output.net
I'm thinking that -g shouldn't just look in the installe
> It would also be nice to have a configurable place for user gnetlist
> scripts.
Something like this?
gnetlist -g where-geda-sh -p private-netlist.scm /dev/null -o output.net
For you it is time to update to geda version 1.6 and revise your
script. The fonts are gone...
Bas
--
__
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:55:11 -0500, Dan White wrote:
> http://www.whiteaudio.com/proj/sch2sym.tar.gz
Great. I'll give it a try.
---<(kaimartin)>---
(Who hopes, that some day such a script will be usablle from within the
gsche GUI)
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pgp.mi
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:01:02 +0200, Bert Timmerman wrote:
> AFAIK, VRML is a common file format and is human readable, that is the
> positive side
Unfortunately, it is not a common file format among 3D mechanical CAD
applications. While VRML output is great for realistic rendering with
blender
Hi Dan,
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:55 -0500, Dan White wrote:
> I have begun to use gaf for an audio prototyping board for a
> University course I'm teaching. The gEDA site claims no
> schematic-to-symbol generator so I rolled my own and am making the
> first-pass available to start to fill the gap
Thinking about a set of scripts to better automate my path from light
library symbols to heavy project symbols. One issue for user scripts
like this is that they need to know where gEDA is installed. For me,
that varies between machines, and sometimes I even have multiple
installations on t
I have begun to use gaf for an audio prototyping board for a
University course I'm teaching. The gEDA site claims no
schematic-to-symbol generator so I rolled my own and am making the
first-pass available to start to fill the gap.
I am been using the gEDA Binary Suite 0.0.2 for the moment until I
Hi Christian,
On Dienstag, 6. Oktober 2009, Christian Riggenbach wrote:
> I just found a little "bug" in sym/analog/resistor-2.sym: one of the
> pins is not aligned to the grid and is a little bit longer. This is
> only visible if you zoom in very far.
It's just a graphical bug. Even if you put i
Hi all,
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:57 +0100, andrew whyte wrote:
> >> 1) No 3D info given --> Guess some decent height from the silk of the
> >> footprint.
>
> >I won't recommend that. Guessing is a bad idea because if it's wrong,
> >bad things can happen: The PCB doesn't fit into the case.
>
+1
Hi
I just found a little "bug" in sym/analog/resistor-2.sym: one of the pins is
not aligned to the grid and is a little bit longer. This is only visible if
you zoom in very far.
The patch is attached.
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen
Christian Riggenbach
criggenb...@magahugu.net
--- resistor-2.sy
Hi Kai-Martin, Frank, Stefan, Peter and all,
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:27 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:58:52 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> > As an older (code no longer in existence) example, perspective like this
> > is not hard to achieve:
> >
> > http://www2.eng.ca
On Oct 1, 2009, at 2:56 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
> John Doty wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 2009, at 2:29 AM, spuzzdawg wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the line of argument I really have an issue with. I mean
>>> making it easier to use by someone who doesn't want to command line
>>> everything.
>>
>> Does every tool
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:33:31 +0200, Christoph Lechner wrote:
>> 3) Full 3D model present --> Add the model to the 3D representation of
>> the board.
> That's the best way -- but of course it's a lot of work to come into a
> position where you have all the 'standard' parts you work with all day
> i
Hi Peter and all,
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 20:06 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 16:38 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:50:37 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> >
> > > IMO, this is _not_ cheating, it is a standard technique. The surface of
> > > a board is fl
>> 1) No 3D info given --> Guess some decent height from the silk of the
>> footprint.
>I won't recommend that. Guessing is a bad idea because if it's wrong,
>bad things can happen: The PCB doesn't fit into the case.
Can I suggest warning the designer, and letting them decide if they
want to go b
22 matches
Mail list logo
