Steven Michalske wrote:
> My Favorite is to use this notation
>
> 3V3 for positive digital 3.3 volts
>
> A3V3 for analog
>
> AN3V3 analog negative
>
> you get the point, its all about taste and alpha-numeric only :-P
>
> Hardkrash
We have one lucky coincidence here...the state of the art of
Subject: geda-user Digest, Vol 23, Issue 9
> 2. Re: geda-user Digest, Vol 23, Issue 7 (Vincent Onelli)
> 8. Re: Parts modified are not available until reloaded gschem
> (Steven Taylor)
> --
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:45:33 -0700
> From: "Steven
My Favorite is to use this notation
3V3 for positive digital 3.3 volts
A3V3 for analog
AN3V3 analog negative
you get the point, its all about taste and alpha-numeric only :-P
Hardkrash
On Apr 6, 2008, at 6:36 AM, gene wrote:
> Is it ok to name a net "3.3VD", for example, using the "."? I
Hi Karl,
On Montag, 7. April 2008, Karl Edler wrote:
> After a little poking around I found the following website full of
> SPICE models:
> http://www.cadence.com/products/orcad/downloads/pspice_models/index.a
>spx
I'd not recommend that models.
The model files are all pretty old.
e.g. The Phil
On Monday 07 April 2008 13:36, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:17:20 -0400, Karl Edler wrote:
> > After a little poking around I found the following website full of SPICE
> > models:
> > http://www.cadence.com/products/orcad/downloads/pspice_models/index.aspx
> >
> > It might be wo
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 18:00 +0100, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Monday 07 April 2008 17:36:51 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > There seems to be a minor bug in icon handling of geda/gaf:
> > Initially icons show up perfectly in nautilus. Symbols are represented by
> > a scaled version of
> > applicati
The copyright is from the vendors not cadence. I am not a lawyer but
that would seem to mean that they don't want anyone to copy the
content they have there and redistribute it. They probably worked out
agreements with the vendors there to put all there content on one
page. I think you just have to
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:17:20 -0400, Karl Edler wrote:
> After a little poking around I found the following website full of SPICE
> models:
> http://www.cadence.com/products/orcad/downloads/pspice_models/index.aspx
>
> It might be worth a look.
Two questions spring to my mind:
1) are these model
On Monday 07 April 2008 17:36:51 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> There seems to be a minor bug in icon handling of geda/gaf:
> Initially icons show up perfectly in nautilus. Symbols are represented by
> a scaled version of
> application-x-geda-symbol.svg
>
> But if I select a symbol file its icon s
There seems to be a minor bug in icon handling of geda/gaf:
Initially icons show up perfectly in nautilus. Symbols are represented by
a scaled version of
application-x-geda-symbol.svg
But if I select a symbol file its icon switches to
application-x-geda-schematic.svg
and stays
On Friday 04 April 2008 15:11, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> > I have started simulating using ngspice and gEDA. I am quite new to the
> > world of SPICE simulation and am wondering how to find models. I see that
> > some transistor datasheets have the models included and that Analog
> > Devices has a zi
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:10:00 -0400, al davis wrote:
>
>> The real question: Should gschem attempt to enforce naming conventions
>> of the various targets?
>
> gnetlist is the component which is responsible for breakage in the
> gschemm-gnetlist-pcb workflow. So gnetlis
12 matches
Mail list logo
