I understand.
Thanks for your help!
El 23/8/2024 a las 12:22, Andrew Brooks escribió:
Yes, the raw data is likely corrupt. When you see the "image without
noise" pygac is probably automatically cropping off the noise for you.
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 21:10, Francisco Vicent
wrote:
Do yo
Yes, the raw data is likely corrupt. When you see the "image without noise"
pygac is probably automatically cropping off the noise for you.
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 21:10, Francisco Vicent
wrote:
> Do you suggest the image itself might be corrupt?
>
> I can see the top of the image without noise i
Do you suggest the image itself might be corrupt?
I can see the top of the image without noise if I extract the individual
bands using pygac and then I create a TCI with GDAL:
https://i.imgur.com/OspvQi7.png
El 21/8/2024 a las 10:49, Andrew Brooks escribió:
That's completely normal for data w
That's completely normal for data which has been received from satellites
that do not have on-board error detection/correction such as NOAA-n (n<20)
On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 22:05, Francisco Vicent via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Hello there, GDAL community!
>
> I'm experiencing s
