Re: [gdal-dev] Doxygen Arguments

2024-05-09 Thread Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
Thanks to all who looked at this and Even for resolution. On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 12:11 PM Even Rouault wrote: > Andrew, > > this is now fixed per > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/393eee77b40ae16751e4d2c0ad3e53386b22d025 > . Doxygen apparently takes the function/method at declaration time,

Re: [gdal-dev] Doxygen Arguments

2024-05-09 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Andrew, this is now fixed per https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/393eee77b40ae16751e4d2c0ad3e53386b22d025 . Doxygen apparently takes the function/method at declaration time, and not definition time, and we had a number of unnamed parameters in declarations. (I also struggled with weird thin

Re: [gdal-dev] Doxygen Arguments

2024-05-09 Thread Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
It looks like Doxygen is using argument names from the function prototype instead of the implementation: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/master/gcore/gdal_priv.h#L753 I did some searching but didn't come across a way to change this behavior. It looks like many other functions include the argume