Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 100: Adding Float16 support to GDAL

But more importantly... I should have started with saying thank you Erik for working on this RFC for GDAL! On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 10:30 AM Kurt Schwehr wrote: > My first pass questions are: > > 1) For folks compiling with C++23*, can they use std::float16_t >

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 100: Adding Float16 support to GDAL

1) For folks compiling with C++23*, can they use std::float16_t ? Sadly, that's not me yet as my environment is C++20. Letting Erik to comment on this (and also underlying that I'm very satisfied with the quality of the big amount work

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 100: Adding Float16 support to GDAL

My first pass questions are: 1) For folks compiling with C++23*, can they use std::float16_t ? Sadly, that's not me yet as my environment is C++20. 2) For when C++23 is the minimum language version for GDAL, what is the plan? (*) https://en

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 100: Adding Float16 support to GDAL

Le 05/11/2024 à 14:15, Erik Schnetter via gdal-dev a écrit : I am interested in GDAL supporting float16 values. My RFC 100 can be viewed here: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/10144 . ( above link is the issue discussing the need. Actual link to the RFC text is at https://github.com/OSGeo

[gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 100: Adding Float16 support to GDAL

I am interested in GDAL supporting float16 values. My RFC 100 can be viewed here: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/10144 . I have also created a candidate implementation that is available at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11180 . I am looking for last comments before I will ask for a vo