Regressions on master at commit r15-8926 vs commit r15-8922 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-8926 vs commit r15-8922 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

Regressions on master at commit r15-8922 vs commit r15-8921 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-8922 vs commit r15-8921 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps New passes:

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8904-ge200f53a555: 2 regressions on aarch64

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 10:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 09:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 00:55, wrote: > > > > > > Dear contributor, > > > > > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > > > find some details b

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-8932 vs commit r15-8926 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-8932 vs commit r15-8926 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/append-args-interop.f90 -O (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/append-args-interop.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8904-ge200f53a555: 2 regressions on aarch64

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 09:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 00:55, wrote: > > > > Dear contributor, > > > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > > find some details below. > > > > In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: > > | commit gcc-15-

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11453 vs commit r14-11448 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11453 vs commit r14-11448 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-8934 vs commit r15-8932 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-8934 vs commit r15-8932 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 25_algorithms/stable_sort/constexpr.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) FAIL: 25_algorithms/stable_sort/constexpr.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) New passes: FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/init

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11454 vs commit r14-11453 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11454 vs commit r14-11453 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_barrier2.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex2.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c -O0 output patte

Regressions on master at commit r15-8936 vs commit r15-8933 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-8936 vs commit r15-8933 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt1.C -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump gimple "_M_range_initialize" FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt1.C -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump gimple "_M_range_initialize"

Regressions on master at commit r15-8917 vs commit r15-8915 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-8917 vs commit r15-8915 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8904-ge200f53a555: 2 regressions on aarch64

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 00:55, wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find > some details below. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: > | commit gcc-15-8904-ge200f53a555 > | Author: Jonathan Wakely > | Date: Tue Mar 25

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-8959 vs commit r15-8945 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-8959 vs commit r15-8945 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: g++.dg/strub-internal-pr112938.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "={v} \\*j_[0-9][0-9]*(D)" 2 FAIL: g++.dg/strub-internal-pr112938.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "={v} \\