Regressions on master at commit r15-7765 vs commit r15-7762 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-7765 vs commit r15-7762 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps New passes:

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11367 vs commit r14-11359 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11367 vs commit r14-11359 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c -O2 output pattern test

Regressions on master at commit r15-7766 vs commit r15-7765 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-7766 vs commit r15-7765 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11359 vs commit r14-11351 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11359 vs commit r14-11351 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c -O2 output pattern te

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-7709-gc2ece13931d: 1 regressions 10 improvements on aarch64

On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 at 23:29, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-regression wrote: > > Excerpts from ci_not...@linaro.org's message of Februar 27, 2025 7:38 pm: > > Dear contributor, > > > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > > find some details below. > > > > In master-