[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3862-g08b8341f209b: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

2024-09-25 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on

Regressions on master at commit r15-3886 vs commit r15-3883 on Linux/i686

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3886 vs commit r15-3883 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/part-vect-popcount-1.c scan-assembler-times vpopcntb[^\n\r]*xmm[0-9] 4 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/part-vect-popcount-1.c scan-assembler-times vpopcntw[^\n\r]*xmm[0-9] 3 New passes:

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3859-g63a598deb0c9: FAIL: 3 regressions on aarch64

2024-09-25 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on

Regressions on master at commit r15-3874 vs commit r15-3871 on Linux/i686

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3874 vs commit r15-3871 on Linux/i686 New failures: New passes: FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/unsigned_25.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/unsigned_25.f90 -O1 (test for excess error

[r15-3862 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr109393.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "return 1;" 3 on Linux/x86_64

2024-09-25 Thread haochen.jiang via Gcc-regression
On Linux/x86_64, 08b8341f209be7c7e301853bdbbcad4f8e1695f5 is the first bad commit commit 08b8341f209be7c7e301853bdbbcad4f8e1695f5 Author: Konstantinos Eleftheriou Date: Thu Sep 5 15:59:59 2024 +0200 match: Change (A * B) + (-C) to (B - C/A) * A, if C multiple of A [PR109393] caused FAIL:

Regressions on master at commit r15-3874 vs commit r15-3871 on Linux/x86_64

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3874 vs commit r15-3871 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gfortran.dg/unsigned_25.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/unsigned_25.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/unsigned_25.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-3872 vs commit r15-3869 on Linux/x86_64

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3872 vs commit r15-3869 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gfortran.dg/unsigned_25.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/unsigned_25.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/unsigned_25.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors

Regressions on master at commit r15-3871 vs commit r15-3863 on Linux/i686

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3871 vs commit r15-3863 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test New passes:

Re: Regressions on native/master at commit r15-3869 vs commit r15-3857 on Linux/x86_64

2024-09-25 Thread Sam James via Gcc-regression
I filed PR116845 for this.

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-3869 vs commit r15-3857 on Linux/x86_64

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3869 vs commit r15-3857 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr109393.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "return 1;" 3 New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r15-3869 vs commit r15-3861 on Linux/x86_64

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3869 vs commit r15-3861 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr109393.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "return 1;" 3 New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r15-3863 vs commit r15-3857 on Linux/i686

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3863 vs commit r15-3857 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr109393.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "return 1;" 3 New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r15-3861 vs commit r15-3857 on Linux/x86_64

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3861 vs commit r15-3857 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3607-g9a94c8ffdc8b: FAIL: 23 regressions: 22 improvements on master-thumb_m23_soft_eabi

2024-09-25 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc-regression
On 24/09/2024 22:20, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: On Sep 25, 2024, at 05:13, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 21/09/2024 08:49, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any question

Regressions on master at commit r15-3854 vs commit r15-3848 on Linux/x86_64

2024-09-25 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-3854 vs commit r15-3848 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps New passes: