[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2799-gf1bfba3a9b3: FAIL: 4 regressions on arm

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on

[r15-2799 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c++/static-aggr-constructor-destructor-2.C scan-tree-dump-times optimized "void _GLOBAL__off_I_" 1 on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, f1bfba3a9b3f31e3e06bfd1911c9f223869ea03f is the first bad commit commit f1bfba3a9b3f31e3e06bfd1911c9f223869ea03f Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Wed Aug 7 19:31:19 2024 +0200 OpenMP: Constructors and destructors for "declare target" static aggregates caused FAIL: libgomp.c++

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-2803 vs commit r15-2798 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-2803 vs commit r15-2798 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: libgomp.c++/static-aggr-constructor-destructor-1.C scan-tree-dump-times optimized "__attribute__\\(\\([^\n\r]*omp declare target nohost" 1 FAIL: libgomp.c++/static-aggr-constructor-destructor-1.C scan-t

Regressions on master at commit r15-2802 vs commit r15-2798 on Linux/i686

Regressions on master at commit r15-2802 vs commit r15-2798 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: libgomp.c++/static-aggr-constructor-destructor-1.C scan-tree-dump-times optimized "__attribute__\\(\\([^\n\r]*omp declare target nohost" 1 FAIL: libgomp.c++/static-aggr-constructor-destructor-1.C scan-tre

Regressions on master at commit r15-2802 vs commit r15-2798 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-2802 vs commit r15-2798 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: libgomp.c++/static-aggr-constructor-destructor-1.C scan-tree-dump-times optimized "__attribute__\\(\\([^\n\r]*omp declare target nohost" 1 FAIL: libgomp.c++/static-aggr-constructor-destructor-1.C scan-t

[r15-2794 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr116258.c scan-assembler-times shufps 1 on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, 5b97d1a2102dca57918947d7e40a6ca68871 is the first bad commit commit 5b97d1a2102dca57918947d7e40a6ca68871 Author: Richard Biener Date: Wed Aug 7 13:54:53 2024 +0200 tree-optimization/116258 - do not lower PAREN_EXPR of vectors caused FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr116258

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-2794 vs commit r15-2793 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-2794 vs commit r15-2793 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr116258.c scan-assembler-times shufps 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr116258.c scan-assembler-times shufps 1 New passes:

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-2793 vs commit r15-2791 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-2793 vs commit r15-2791 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: g++.dg/other/sse2-pr85572-1.C -std=gnu++17 scan-assembler-times \\mpsrlq\\M 1 FAIL: g++.dg/other/sse2-pr85572-1.C -std=gnu++17 scan-assembler-times \\mpsrlq\\M 1 FAIL: g++.dg/other/sse

Regressions on master at commit r15-2794 vs commit r15-2792 on Linux/i686

Regressions on master at commit r15-2794 vs commit r15-2792 on Linux/i686 New failures: New passes: FAIL: g++.dg/other/sse2-pr85572-1.C -std=gnu++17 scan-assembler-times \\mpsrlq\\M 1 FAIL: g++.dg/other/sse2-pr85572-1.C -std=gnu++17 scan-assembler-times \\mpsubq\\M 2 FAIL: g++.dg/other/sse2-

Regressions on master at commit r15-2794 vs commit r15-2792 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-2794 vs commit r15-2792 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: g++.dg/other/sse2-pr85572-1.C -std=gnu++17 scan-assembler-times \\mpsrlq\\M 1 FAIL: g++.dg/other/sse2-pr85572-1.C -std=gnu++17 scan-assembler-times \\mpsrlq\\M 1 FAIL: g++.dg/other/sse

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-2791 vs commit r15-2789 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-2791 vs commit r15-2789 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) N

Regressions on master at commit r15-2791 vs commit r15-2789 on Linux/i686

Regressions on master at commit r15-2791 vs commit r15-2789 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) New

Regressions on master at commit r15-2791 vs commit r15-2789 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-2791 vs commit r15-2789 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) N

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-2789 vs commit r15-2780 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-2789 vs commit r15-2780 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 execution test

Regressions on master at commit r15-2789 vs commit r15-2780 on Linux/i686

Regressions on master at commit r15-2789 vs commit r15-2780 on Linux/i686 New failures: New passes: FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test