> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 1:09 PM
> To: Jiang, Haochen
> Cc: j...@ventanamicro.com; gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [r15-2196 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-6.c
> -std=gnu++98 execut
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 01:49:06AM +, Jiang, Haochen wrote:
> It might be a false positive timeout alert. Please ignore that first.
It is not. I'm seeing it too consistently on i686-linux:
obj49/LOGT:FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-10.c execution test
obj49/LOGT:FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/conv
On 7/23/24 7:49 PM, Jiang, Haochen wrote:
It might be a false positive timeout alert. Please ignore that first.
Funny, I was wondering about that -- I couldn't get them to fail.
Jeff
It might be a false positive timeout alert. Please ignore that first.
Thx,
Haochen
> -Original Message-
> From: haochen.jiang
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2024 7:51 PM
> To: j...@ventanamicro.com; gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org; Jiang, Haochen
> Subject: [r15-2196 R
Regressions on master at commit r15-2234 vs commit r15-2230 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)
FA
Regressions on master at commit r15-2234 vs commit r15-2230 on Linux/i686
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)
FAIL
Regressions on master at commit r15-2234 vs commit r15-2230 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)
FA
Regressions on master at commit r15-2226 vs commit r15-2217 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c execution test
FAI
On Linux/x86_64,
88d16194d0c8a6bdc2896c8944bfbf3e6038c9d2 is the first bad commit
commit 88d16194d0c8a6bdc2896c8944bfbf3e6038c9d2
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Jul 22 08:45:10 2024 -0600
[NFC][PR rtl-optimization/115877] Avoid setting irrelevant bit groups as
live in ext-dce
caused
FAIL: c
Regressions on master at commit r15-2217 vs commit r15-2210 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/
10 matches
Mail list logo