Regressions on master at commit r15-500 vs commit r15-498 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr107563-a.C scan-assembler-times por 1
FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr107563-a.C scan-assembler-times psllw 1
FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr107563-a.C scan-assembler-times psraw 1
FAIL: g++.targe
Regressions on master at commit r15-498 vs commit r15-495 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects (tes
Regressions on master at commit r15-430 vs commit r15-428 on Linux/i686
New failures:
FAIL: experimental/simd/pr109261_constexpr_simd.cc -msse2 -O2 -Wno-psabi (test
for excess errors)
New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-367 vs commit r15-365 on Linux/i686
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/vect-shiftv4qi.c scan-assembler-times psrlw 5
New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-493 vs commit r15-487 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-6.c execution test
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on
Regressions on master at commit r15-491 vs commit r15-490 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
Regressions on master at commit r15-487 vs commit r15-481 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-12.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-14.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c execution test
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10208 vs commit r14-10207 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-12.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-15.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-6.c ex
Regressions on master at commit r15-490 vs commit r15-485 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
New passes:
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8773 vs commit r13-8772 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc-dg-lto-pr113359-2-01.exe scan-wpa-ipa-dump icf "Semantic equality
hit:geta/.*getb/"
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr113359-2 c_lto_pr113359-2_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-ipa-cp
On Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 17:42:09 MESZ Jiang, Haochen wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> From my side, I get several error like this:
>
> /export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-429/bld/x86_64-linux
> /32/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/simd_builtin.h:131: error: could
> not conver
Hi Matthias,
From my side, I get several error like this:
/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-429/bld/x86_64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/simd_builtin.h:131:
error: could not convert
'std::experimental::parallelism_v2::__vec_shuffle<__vector(4) wchar_t,
_
Regressions on master at commit r15-481 vs commit r15-438 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-12.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-14.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10207 vs commit r14-10201 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-12.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-15.c execution test
Thanks for the report. But I'm unable to reproduce the issue. I'm testing on a
Skylake-AVX512 system. I even did a clean rebuild of all of GCC using your
configuration (minus your prefix) and still no failure.
Could you please send me your libstdc++.log after failing the test?
Best,
Matthias
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8773 vs commit r13-8772 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc-dg-lto-pr113359-2-01.exe scan-wpa-ipa-dump icf "Semantic equality
hit:geta/.*getb/"
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr113359-2 c_lto_pr113359-2_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-ipa-cp
17 matches
Mail list logo