On 10 October 2012 22:57, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 10/10/12 03:11, Janis Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On 10/09/2012 07:39 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27/09/12 01:02, Janis Johnson wrote:
Test gcc.target/arm/div64-unwinding.c is known to fail for GNU/Linux
targets, as describe
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:33:17 +0100
> Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> On 6 May 2011 14:13, Julian Brown wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is the second of two patches to add unaligned-access support to
>> > the ARM backend. It builds on the fir
On 17 August 2012 07:29, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:56:52 +0100
> Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> On 07/24/12 13:27, Julian Brown wrote:
>> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:15:27 +0100
>> > Julian Brown wrote:
>> >
>> >> Anyway: this revised version of the patch removes the strange
>>
On 18 June 2012 22:17, Carrot Wei wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could ARM maintainers review following patches?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00497.html
> 64bit add/sub constants.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01834.html
> 64bit and with constants.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml
/testsuite/
2012-07-03 Michael Hope
PR c++/53814
* g++.dg/cpp0x/nullptr28.C: Change selector for explicit
options.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nullptr28.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nullptr28.C
index 05fbe57..4cc790d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x
On 5 July 2012 21:13, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
> On 26/06/12 14:44, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>
>> On 25/06/12 15:59, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> This patch adds support to the ARM backend for generating floating-point
>>> fused multiply-accumulate.
>>>
>>> OK?
>>>
>>> gcc/C
re enabled as expected.
OK for 4.7?
-- Michael
2012-07-25 Michael Hope
Backport from mainline r186389:
2012-04-12 Andreas Schwab
* testsuite/Makefile.am (check_DEJAGNUnormal0): Run
prettyprinters.exp.
* testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerated.
diff --git
cc'ed the libstdc++ list. Ping?
-- Michael
On 25/07/12 12:12, Michael Hope wrote:
The libstdc++ prettyprinters test suite isn't called out in Makefile.am.
Backport Andreas's
patch from mainline so that a sequential test run gives the same results as a
parallel test.
On 27 April 2012 08:20, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
>> 2012-04-24 Michael Hope
>> Richard Earnshaw
>>
>> * config/arm/linux-eabi.h (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_SOFT_FLOAT): Define.
>>
On 1 May 2012 03:24, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 27/04/12 00:27, Michael Hope wrote:
>> On 27 April 2012 08:20, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Michael Hope
>>> wrote:
>>>> 2012-04-24 Michael Hope
>>>>
On 1 May 2012 10:01, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/30/2012 03:47 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> 2012-04-27 Michael Hope
>>>>
>>>> * config/arm/linux-eabi.h (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Pick the loader
>>>> using a spec rule
}
"'
errors which have appeared in recent 4.6 builds.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions. Changes the ERROR to
UNSUPPORTED.
OK for 4.6?
-- Michael
2012-05-21 Michael Hope
PR 53170
Backport from mainline
2011-11-08 Jason Merrill
* lib/
On 21/05/12 21:14, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:45 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
The testsuite for PR52796 uses the 'target c++11' selector which doesn't exist
in 4.6.
This patch backports the selector, clearing the 'ERROR:
g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic-value1.C:
syntax erro
On 24 May 2012 02:16, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 May 2012 04:17:51 Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 May 2012, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:56:31 Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> > > [...]
>> > > This is a behaviour change. It would need RM approval for a re
On 24 May 2012 00:27, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 05:39 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
>>
>> On 21/05/12 21:14, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/21/2012 01:45 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The testsuite for PR52796 uses th
On 8 June 2012 12:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> (CC to ARM maintainer approving the original patch.)
>
> I'm listing this under "caveats" rather than "improvements" and
> before the current top ARM-related caveat (as this one is more
> important :) because I don't see performance figures in the
On 8 June 2012 15:20, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> From: Michael Hope
>> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 04:42:30 +0200
>
>> On 8 June 2012 12:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> > The "some source
>> > codes" was in the analyzed case a strcpy of a five-byt
On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
>> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:29:04 +0200
>
>> > From: Michael Hope
>> > Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 05:50:52 +0200
>> > The combination of
>> > older Linux ARM kernel
On 13 June 2012 02:32, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
>> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:59:57 +0200
>
>> > From: Michael Hope
>> > Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:04:19 +0200
>>
>> > On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsso
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch adds support for -mcpu=native, -mtune=native, and -march=native
> for ARM Linux hosts.
>
> So far, it only recognises Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9, so I really need to find
> out what the magic part numbers are for other cpu
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Stubbs, Andrew
wrote:
> On 29/08/11 04:29, Michael Hope wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for -mcpu=native, -mtune=native, and -march=native
>>
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the problem in PR 50305 turned out to be caused by the ARM back-end
> LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS implementation.
Interesting the fault goes away with -mfpu=neon, perhaps due to the DI
mode operations getting pushed out into NEON r
/
2012-03-16 Michael Hope
Backport from mainline
2011-05-05 Michael Hope
PR pch/45979
* config/host-linux.c (TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE): Define for
__ARM_EABI__ hosts.
diff --git a/gcc/config/host-linux.c b/gcc/config/host-linux.c
index 47ce3ea..ec61055 100644
r uClibc
and Bionic by always using the GLIBC loader in hard float mode. The
final line in the spec is missing a '=hard' and always adds
/lib/ld-linux.so.3.
How about:
2012-04-03 Michael Hope
* config/arm/linux-eabi.h (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HARD_FLOAT): Define.
(GLIBC
On 4 April 2012 04:17, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 05:09 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 03/04/12 12:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:45:30AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
If, so then there's only one way to sort out this mess.
/lib/arm-linux-gnueab
On 4 April 2012 11:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:18:59AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> >> The subdirectories could be called fred and jim and it would still work.
>> >> The only thing required is that this part of the naming scheme be
>&
2012/4/4 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
:
> Em 3 de abril de 2012 20:48, Michael Hope escreveu:
>> Yip, as is Ubuntu Precise, Debian unstable, and a skew of Gentoo.
>> None have been released yet. Here's my understanding:
>>
>> Fedora 17:
>> * ARM is
On 4 April 2012 10:56, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Michael Hope wrote:
>
>> +#define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER \
>> + "%{mhard-float:" GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HARD_FLOAT "} \
>> + %{mfloat-abi=hard:" GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HARD_FLOAT &q
On 4 April 2012 18:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:34:30PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> > I did two ports of Mandriva to armv7. One of my choice to use softfp,
>> > and another hardfp port to be compatible with other distros. But other
>> &
On 4 April 2012 21:06, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Michael Hope wrote:
>
>> The tricky one is new GCC with old GLIBC. GCC may have to do a
>> configure time test and fall back to /lib/ld-linux.so.3 if the hard
>> float loader is missing.
>
> I don&
On 5 April 2012 12:07, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Michael Hope wrote:
>
>> > I don't think that's appropriate for ABI issues. If a different dynamic
>> > linker name is specified, GCC should use it unconditionally (and require
>> > ne
On 5 April 2012 15:56, wrote:
> Reviewers: Diego Novillo, jingyu, davidxl,
>
> Message:
> Please take a look at this patch and tell me if it's OK for
> branches/google/gcc-4_6.
>
> Description:
> Backported the following patch from trunk:
>
> 2011-10-07 Andrew Stubbs
>
> gcc/
> * config/
On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>>And here's the details as promised.
>>
>>I've started a wiki page at
>>
>>https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/HardFloat/LinkerPathCallApr2012
>>
>>with a strawman agenda for now, an
2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
:
> Em 11 de abril de 2012 20:22, Michael Hope escreveu:
>> On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>>
>>>>And here's the details as
On 12 April 2012 12:38, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Michael Hope [2012-04-12 12:16 +1200]:
>> 2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>> :
>
>> >> All good. My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it:
>> > Sorry for more bikeshedding,
>> > /l
2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
:
> Em 11 de abril de 2012 21:16, Michael Hope escreveu:
>> 2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>> :
>>> Em 11 de abril de 2012 20:22, Michael Hope
>>> escreveu:
>>>> On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyr
60.html
[2] http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2012-04/msg00064.html
2012-04-23 Michael Hope
* config/arm/linux-eabi.h (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HARD_FLOAT): Define.
(GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_SOFT_FLOAT): Define.
(GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Redefine to use the hard float path.
di
On 24 April 2012 03:35, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 22/04/12 23:20, Michael Hope wrote:
>> Change the dynamic linker path for ARM hard float executables.
>> Matches the path discussed and agreed on last week[1]. Carlos will
>> follow up with the matching patch to GLIBC[2].
On 21 April 2012 00:57, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is the patch that adds support for divide 64-bit by constant for
> 32-bit target machines, this patch was tested on arm-7a with no new
> regressions, also I am not sure on how to avoid for example i686
> targets since div operation the
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Greta Yorsh wrote:
> I'm attaching a new version of the patch. Fixed all comments and retested.
> No regression on qemu --with-cpu cortex-a9.
I assume that on the Cortex-A9 this generates a LDM instead of an
expensive LDRD. For reference, a tight load loop takes 2
Hi there,
This patch enables the ARM inline assembly 64 bit add, subtract, and multiply
instructions
in libgcc when compiling for Thumb-2. The existing code enables them for ARM
mode as
Thumb-1 is missing the encodings.
OK for 4.8?
-- Michael
ChangeLog:
2012-03-08 Michael Hope
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I couldn't find anything terribly tricky about the conversion.
>
> The existing push_mult pattern would service thumb1 with just
> a tweak or two to the memory predicate and the length.
>
> The existing emit_multi_reg_push wasn't set up t
Ubuntu 2.6.35 kernel. Bootstraps OK and clears
all of the PCH testsuite failures. Note that this change is
equivalent to Mikael Pettersson's patch at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02252.html
OK for trunk?
-- Michael
gcc/
2011-05-02 Michael Hope
PR pch/
43 matches
Mail list logo
