Re: [PATCH] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI

2012-04-04 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 09:06:05 + (UTC) "Joseph S. Myers" wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Michael Hope wrote: > > > The tricky one is new GCC with old GLIBC. GCC may have to do a > > configure time test and fall back to /lib/ld-linux.so.3 if the hard > > float loader is missing. > > I don't think

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI

2012-04-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:54:12 +0200 Jakub Jelinek escribió: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:34:30PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote: > > >  I did two ports of Mandriva to armv7. One of my choice to use > > > softfp, and another hardfp port to be compatible with other > > > distros. But other than a previous

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI

2012-04-10 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:18:51 +0300 Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:36:07 +0200 > Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > We really want consistency about the dynamic linker names etc. > > across different targets and sneaking silently multiarch paths on > > one architecture would make i