Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Delayed parsing for bounds safety attributes

2025-07-23 Thread Aaron Ballman
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 5:47 AM Martin Uecker wrote: > This is a personal stance of mine, not a Clang community response. > IMHO there are enough reasons to reject delayed parsing > as bad design for C. We should work towards proper > language features that cleanly fit into the language, > inst

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Delayed parsing for bounds safety attributes

2025-07-24 Thread Aaron Ballman
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 8:38 PM Martin Uecker wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, dem 23.07.2025 um 11:53 + schrieb Aaron Ballman: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 5:47 AM Martin Uecker wrote: > > > > > > > This is a personal stance of mine, not a Clang community response

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Delayed parsing for bounds safety attributes

2025-07-24 Thread Aaron Ballman
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 7:40 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:53:40AM +, Aaron Ballman wrote: > > That said, John McCall pointed out some usage patterns Apple has with > > their existing feature: > > > > * 655 simple references to variables o

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Delayed parsing for bounds safety attributes

2025-07-24 Thread Aaron Ballman
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 PM Martin Uecker wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 24.07.2025 um 14:08 + schrieb Aaron Ballman: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 8:38 PM Martin Uecker wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > That said, John McCall pointed out som

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Delayed parsing for bounds safety attributes

2025-07-24 Thread Aaron Ballman
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 6:11 PM Martin Uecker wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 24.07.2025 um 16:26 + schrieb Aaron Ballman: > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 PM Martin Uecker wrote: > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 24.07.2025 um 14:08 + schrieb Aaron Ballman: >