lized]
"xtsqrt %0,%x1"
~^
../../gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md: In function 'rtx_def*
gen_vsx_tsqrtv4sf2_fe(rtx, rtx)':
../../gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md:1415:14: error: 'operands[2]' is used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
"xts
1.C -std=gnu++11 (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.dg/Walloca1.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20170308/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/Walloca1.C:6:48: warning:
unbounded use of 'alloca' [-Walloca-larger-than=]
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch..
ction is now empty. Should it be removed at all?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
2.7.2
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
: GCC vector
returned by reference: non-standard ABI extension with no compatibility
guarantee
/daten/gcc/gcc-20160307/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70050.c:8:1: warning: GCC vector
passed by reference: non-standard ABI extension with no compatibility guarantee
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@li
, v16u32
> v16u32_1, v16u64 v16u64_1)
On powerpc -m32:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr69634.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/gcc/gcc-20160307/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69634.c:11:1: warning: GCC
vector passed by reference: non-standard ABI extension with no compatibility
guarantee
Andreas.
-
I extension with no compatibility
guarantee
/daten/gcc/gcc-20160307/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/simd-8.c:7:1: warning: GCC vector
passed by reference: non-standard ABI extension with no compatibility guarantee
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
y
guarantee
/daten/gcc/gcc-20160307/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/simd-7.c:7:1: warning: GCC vector
passed by reference: non-standard ABI extension with no compatibility guarantee
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
#12 0x41a44870 in do_compile () at ../../gcc/toplev.c:1988
#13 0x41a45120 in toplev::main (this=0x600ef090, argc=2,
argv=0x600ef348) at ../../gcc/toplev.c:2096
#14 0x40000318cad0 in main (argc=2, argv=0x600ef348)
at ../../gcc/main.c:39
Andreas.
ls on ia64:
$ grep " <= " pr68714.c.211t.optimized
_10 = _8 <= _9 ? -1 : 0;
_13 = _11 <= _12 ? -1 : 0;
_16 = _14 <= _15 ? -1 : 0;
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
FFI_SIZEOF_JAVA_RAW 4
typedef unsigned long long ffi_arg;
typedef signed long long ffi_sarg;
#else
--
2.7.3
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
+# define CPP_WORDSZ 64
+# endif
# define MACH_TYPE "AARCH64"
-# define ALIGNMENT 8
# ifndef HBLKSIZE
# define HBLKSIZE 4096
# endif
--
2.7.3
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
&q
James Greenhalgh writes:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:18:43PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Like x32, aarch64 ILP32 needs to define FFI_SIZEOF_JAVA_RAW. This fixes
>> the java interpreter.
>
> Should this go through upstream libffi first? I can't remember the right
Jeff Law writes:
> PR rtl-optimization/70024
That's probably a typo.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Marc Glisse writes:
> For most packages, providing CFLAGS for configure is enough, you don't
> have to give them *again* to make.
The toplevel GCC Makefile needs to pass down any CFLAGS setting that has
been passed in by the user.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.
Marc Glisse writes:
> Or do you mean that it is supported, from gcc's directory, to call:
> make configure-stage1-gmp
> make all-stage1-gmp CFLAGS="something new"
Yes, that is mandated by the GCS.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerpri
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> For guality, the most effective test for regressions is simply always
> running contrib/test_summary after all your bootstraps and then just
> diffing up that against the same from earlier bootstrap.
Or use contrib/compare_tests.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
+/* { dg-do run { target { { powerpc*-*-darwin* powerpc*-*-aix* rs6000-*-* }
> || { powerpc*-*-linux* && lp64 } } } } */
Any reason why it is restricted to lp64?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D
addr_space_1 instead of convert_memory_address,
> if it returns NULL, don't simplify.
I have successfully bootstrapped it on ILP32 and verified that it fixes
the ICE.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
ten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160414/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/vla11.C:122:5: error:
static assertion failed: wrong test type size
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160414/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/vla11.C:122:5: error:
static assertion failed: wrong test type size
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160414/gcc/testsuite/g+
ray 'T15' is negative
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20160426/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr63831-1.c:47:1:
error: unknown type name 'T14'
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
(uintptr_t)0xf;
> + return (ucontext_t*)p;
> +}
> +
You should use alignof(ucontext_t) instead of hardcoding 16.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_assoc_2.f03 -O (test for errors, line 23)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr77507.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/opt/gcc/gcc-20160910/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr77507.f90:3:6: Fatal Error:
Can't open module file 'ieee_arithmetic.mod' for reading at (1): No such file
or directory
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwa
)'
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
14 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pr67989.C (test for excess errors)
They all fail with "warning: requested alignment %d is larger than 2
[-Wattributes]".
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276
On Sep 13 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Does this help?
Unfortunatly no.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
On Sep 13 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Sep 13 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>>> Does this help?
>>
>> Unfortunatly no.
>
> It occurs to me that this function doesn't need to restrict t
f ((OFFSET) != 0) \
fprintf (FILE, "+" HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, OFFSET); \
fputc (')', FILE); \
} while (0)
--
2.10.0
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Ke
f ((OFFSET) != 0) \
- fprintf (FILE, "+" HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, OFFSET); \
+ fprintf (FILE, "+" HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, \
+ (HOST_WIDE_INT) (OFFSET)); \
fputc (')',
TORS'
if (TARGET_VTABLE_USES_DESCRIPTORS)
^~
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
ter (28, 0, (void * *) &caf_token.0, (void *) &desc.2, 0B,
0B, 0);
_gfortran_caf_register (D.986, 1, &((struct mytype)
*object).indices.token, &((struct mytype) *object).indices, 0B, 0B, 0);
_gfortran_caf_register (D.986, 1, &((struct mytype)
*object).indices.token, &((struct mytype) *object).indices, 0B, 0B, 0);
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
quot;$glibcxx_cv_atomic_int" = yes; then
> + && test "$glibcxx_cv_atomic_int" = yes ) \
> + || test "$atomicity_dir" = "cpu/generic/atomicity_builtins"; then
In the shell grouping is expressed by { }.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
quot;$glibcxx_cv_atomic_int" = yes; then
> + && test "$glibcxx_cv_atomic_int" = yes } \
You need a semicolon (or newline) before }.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
2 of the destination
object [-Wformat-length=]
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
en.0, (integer(kind=4)) parm.22.data -
(integer(kind=4)) a, 1, &parm.22, 0B, &p, 4, 4, 1, 0B);
_gfortran_caf_get (caf_token.1, (integer(kind=4)) parm.28.data -
(integer(kind=4)) b, 1, &parm.28, 0B, &p, 4, 4, 0, 0B);
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fi
On Sep 22 2016, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On 22 September 2016 11:11:42 CEST, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>On Sep 22 2016, Sebastian Huber
>>wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4 b/libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
>>> index 6d897be..d7db435 100
ext
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160926/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_sequence.tcc:112:
error: 'void __gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator_base::_M_detach_single()' is
protected within this context
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8
On Sep 26 2016, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 10:27:13 CEST, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>On Sep 22 2016, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 September 2016 11:11:42 CEST, Andreas Schwab
>>wrote:
>>>>On Sep 22 2016, S
insn-emit.o -MMD -MP -MF
./.deps/insn-emit.TPo insn-emit.c
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-implicit-fallthrough"
make[3]: *** [insn-emit.o] Error 1
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3
figure test for whether -Wno-implicit-fallthrough
> works, and using @W_NO_IMPLICIT_FALLTHROUGH@ in there or something similar
> (or stick that into a make variable and use $(W_NO_IMPLICIT_FALLTHROUGH)).
Perhaps some general construct that suppresses -Wno-foo in stage1 only?
Andreas.
--
On Sep 30 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> * config/m68k/m68k.c (m68k_excess_precision): New.
> (TARGET_C_EXCESS_PRECISION): Define.
Ok.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"
nil))
/daten/aranym/gcc/test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/m68k/stack-limit-1.c:6:1:
internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2287
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
:3745
0x6a4e96 expand_gimple_basic_block
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:5752
0x6aa806 execute
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:6363
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
On Okt 01 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> Which architecture?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-10/msg00021.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-10/msg00049.html
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 2
This miscompiles the stage2 ada compiler.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
br.ret.sptk.many rp
- .endp __do_jv_register_classes
-
#ifdef SHARED
.weak __cxa_finalize
#endif
--
2.10.1
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
/aranym/gcc/gcc-20161005/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr49847-2.C:43:19: error:
'value2' was not declared in this scope
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20161005/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr49847-2.C:43:41: error:
'union _Jv_word' has no member named 'i'
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
; ""))] ; label
""
{
+ if (GET_MODE (operands[0]) != DImode)
+FAIL;
+
emit_jump_insn (gen_doloop_end_internal (gen_rtx_REG (DImode, AR_LC_REGNUM),
operands[1]));
DONE;
--
2.10.1
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
G
ename_ok (FROM, TO)
> + s390_hard_regno_rename_ok ((FROM), (TO))
That should not be necessary. The only way to get an error is if you
play dirty games with macros expanding to a bare comma.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D
still need to call fstat? I don't think it can ever fail here.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new7.C (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20161013/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new7.C:13:41:
warning: requested alignment 8 is larger than 2 [-Wattributes]
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint
orted" "" { target *-*-* } 0 } */
void dummy (void) { }
--
2.10.1
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
the compiler to crash.
*** glibc detected ***
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20161015/Build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../f951: free():
invalid pointer: 0x600524b0 ***^M
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"A
ing to duplicate the whole file for
every target?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Wtrampolines.c (test for warnings, line 31)
Since ia64 never uses trampolines this is probably ok and the test
should be adjusted.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
= -2147483648
ia64-suse-linux/libgo/gen-sysinfo.go:// unknowndefine EPOLLET EPOLLET
ia64-suse-linux/libgo/gen-sysinfo.go:const _EPOLLET = -2147483648
ia64-suse-linux/libgo/sysinfo.go:const _EPOLLET = -2147483648
ia64-suse-linux/libgo/sysinfo.go:const EPOLLET = _EPOLLET
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE
gcc/gcc-20161019/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Walloca-2.c:34:9: warning:
unbounded use of 'alloca' [-Walloca-larger-than=]
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
At line 74 of file /opt/gcc/gcc-20161019/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_17.f90
(unit = 28, file = '/tmp/gfortrantmpQF10b7')
Fortran runtime error: Bad value during integer read
Error termination. Backtrace:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_17.f90 -O1 execution test
Andreas.
--
Andreas Sc
On Okt 19 2016, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 06:45 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/Walloca-1.c (test for warnings, line 26)
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/Walloca-1.c (test for excess errors)
>> Excess errors:
>> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20161019/gcc/testsu
rsion number.
There is only one version of the library, the one just built.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
On Okt 19 2016, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Could you try compiling manually the failing test with gfortran -static
> and then run it to see what happens.
That does not change anything.
> Also what target is this failing on.
aarch64 and m68k.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE
on m68k.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
On Okt 18 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> * domwalk.c (dom_walker::walk): Use RPO order.
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr35356-1.c scan-tree-dump graphite "if \\(P_8 >= P_9 \\+
1 && P_9 >= 0\\) \\{"
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key finger
al/gcc/gcc-20161026/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dec_bitwise_ops_1.f90:99:18:
Error: Can't convert INTEGER(4) to INTEGER(4) at (1)
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20161026/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dec_bitwise_ops_1.f90:100:26:
Error: Can't convert INTEGER(4) to INTEGER(4) at (1)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Sch
On Okt 26 2016, Fritz Reese wrote:
> I can't seem to reproduce this on x86-64. Did you fully apply the
> patch?
I don't have any patches.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"
On Okt 26 2016, Fritz Reese wrote:
> If so, I am not sure how to narrow down the issue without more debug
> info like a traceback or memory dump at the point of error.
Tell me more, I don't know anything about fortran.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key
I have filed PR78128, this may be a target bug.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
+open(unit=fd,file=f,action='read',readonly)
> +close(unit=fd,status='delete') ! XFAIL "protected by READONLY"
> +
> +end
At line 12 of file
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20161027/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dec_io_6.f90 (unit = 8)
Fortran runtime error: Cannot open file
-do 1 run { target cxx11 } "
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
n function 'Ada.Text_Io.Editing.To_Picture':
a-teioed.adb:2724:4: error: alignment of array elements is greater than element
size
a-teioed.adb: In function 'Ada.Text_Io.Editing.Valid':
a-teioed.adb:2751:4: error: alignment of array elements is greater than element
size
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
GOARCH=ia64
GOARCH_FAMILY=IA64
GOARCH_CACHELINESIZE=16384
-GOARCH_PHYSPAGESIZE=8192
+GOARCH_PHYSPAGESIZE=65536
;;
m68k*-*-*)
GOARCH=m68k
--
2.10.1
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B
SIZE_TYPE "unsigned int"
>
> #undef PTRDIFF_TYPE
> -#define PTRDIFF_TYPE "long int"
> +#define PTRDIFF_TYPE "int"
>
> #undef WCHAR_TYPE
> #define WCHAR_TYPE "int"
This changes the C++ ABI. You need to fix the kernel instead, see
arch
ter: Overflow
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
ot; "ldist" } }
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90 -O scan-tree-dump ldist "distributed: split
to"
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
x27;s much better?
That generates 231 identically named tests, which is bad. All tests
must have unique titles.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
result = 0;
void __attribute__((noinline))
caught(int bit)
{
- result &= bit;
+ result |= bit;
}
struct A { };
--
2.9.1
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> Or, if using GNU ar, you can even use -S, if that helps (after testing
> for it in configure, of course).
BSD ar has it too.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
&q
former also adds -lc_p.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
s should be lower.
Linking a thin archive requires opening each archive member as a file
instead of only reading within a single file. This could add some
non-trivial overhead.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276
;= then you can enable it on more hosts.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
; + if (a)
> + f2 ();
> +}
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to if \\(_\[0-9\]* ==
> 0\\)" "ccp1" } } */
This fails on all ilp32 platforms.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
ECT:8:_ZTISt12codecvt_base@@GLIBCXX_3.4
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
] & 15;
> + rand_state.p = put->base_addr[SZ * GFC_DESCRIPTOR_STRIDE(put, 0)] % 15;
The comment no longer fits.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
,
long long _Fract/Accum. */
--
2.9.2
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
--with-fpu=vfpv3-d16-fp16
>
> (or similarly on arm-none-eabi --with-cpu=cortex-m3 --with-mode=thumb)
Also fails on m68k.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
configure: error: no --with-target-bdw-gc options and no bdw-gc pkg-config
module found
make[1]: *** [Makefile:19775: configure-target-libobjc] Error 1
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And no
On Nov 30 2016, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I assume that is a configuration with --enable-objc-gc
No.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
an-assembler-not popcnt
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
ll_program_units
../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:5977
0x5e70b2 gfc_parse_file()
../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:6224
0x629da2 gfc_be_parse_file
../../gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:202
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4
2:
error: '__int128' is not supported on this target.
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-add-7.c (test for excess errors)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
builtins-3.c (test for excess errors)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
(?n)^\\s+[a-z] 9466
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-2.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldic 2840
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-2.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rlwinm 721
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-2.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+srdi 12
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux
On Dez 05 2016, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> What's your target triple?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-12/msg00471.html
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
/attr-alloc_size-3.c:299:3:
warning: argument 1 value '4294967295' exceeds maximum object size 2147483647
[-Walloc-size-larger-than=]
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
gfc_be_parse_file
../../gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:202
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
On Dez 14 2016, Martin Sebor wrote:
> +#define target_dir_max() (target_int_max () + 4932 + 2)
> + if (9864 < prec)
> + prec = 9864;
Should these two magic numbers be macroized?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1C
0x4043e5ef c_common_parse_file()
../../gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1098
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
901 - 1000 of 1471 matches
Mail list logo
