On Dez 03 2020, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> ../../../../libffi/src/aarch64/ffi.c: In function 'ffi_prep_closure_loc':
> ../../../../libffi/src/aarch64/ffi.c:67:3: error: both arguments to
> '__builtin___clear_cache' must be pointers
>67 | __b
On Dez 03 2020, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> I'm afraid we cannot support both given the current setup, so you'll have to
> make a choice for the powerpc64-suse-linux compiler.
I'm using the same configuration as the system compiler. There is no
choice to make.
Andreas.
--
~
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
cc-20201209/gcc/testsuite/go.test/go-test.exp" line 1217)
invoked from within
"source /opt/gcc/gcc-20201209/gcc/testsuite/go.test/go-test.exp"
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 source /opt/gcc/gcc-20201209/gcc/testsuite/go.test/
a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: profile of "Pow" doesn't match the builtin it binds
make[7]: *** [../gcc-interface/Makefile:302: a-nallfl.o] Error 1
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
target_os))),)
>s-tpopsp.adbsystem.ads
> + ifeq ($(strip $(filter-out sparc64 sparcv9,$(target_cpu))),)
> +ifneq ($(strip $(MULTISUBDIR)),/32)
> + LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS += $(GNATRTL_128BIT_PAIRS)
> + EXTRA_GNATRTL_NONTASKING_OBJS += $(GNATRTL_128BIT_OBJS)
> +
> $(target_os))),)
>TOOLS_TARGET_PAIRS = indepsw.adb
>EXTRA_GNATRTL_NONTASKING_OBJS += $(TRASYM_DWARF_UNIX_OBJS)
> - EXTRA_GNATRTL_NONTASKING_OBJS += $(GNATRTL_128BIT_OBJ
> + EXTRA_GNATRTL_NONTASKING_OBJS += $(GNATRTL_128BIT_OBJ)
That variable doesn't exist.
Andreas.
--
An
Perhaps rvv.exp should add -I. so that the wrapper is found regardless?
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
../../gcc/omp-low.cc:14662
0xd318a3 lower_omp_1
../../gcc/omp-low.cc:14452
0xd318a3 lower_omp
../../gcc/omp-low.cc:14662
0xd377fb execute_lower_omp
../../gcc/omp-low.cc:14701
0xd377fb execute
../../gcc/omp-low.cc:14755
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocess
On Nov 13 2022, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Can you please confirm that it fixes your issues?
Looks good.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
k -mno-csr-check @gol}
There should be no @gol at the end of the list.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
../../gcc/config/riscv/generic.md:28:1: unknown value `smin' for attribute
`type'
make[3]: *** [Makefile:2528: s-attrtab] Error 1
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
s per insn
achieved (90)
686 | }
| ^
0xe8a5e8 lra_constraints(bool)
../../gcc/lra-constraints.cc:5319
0xe71f32 lra(_IO_FILE*)
../../gcc/lra.cc:2375
0xe21731 do_reload
../../gcc/ira.cc:5967
0xe21731 execute
../../gcc/ira.cc:6153
--
Andreas Schwab
;;
> mem location
> (set (match_dup 1)
> - (unspec_volatile:SI [(match_operand:SI 2 "reg_or_0_operand" "rJ") ;;
> expected value
> - (match_operand:SI 3 "reg_or_0_operand" "rJ")] ;;
> desired value
> + (unspec_volatile:SI[(match_operand:SI 2 "reg_or_0_operand" "rJ") ;;
> expected value
> + (match_operand:SI 3 "reg_or_0_operand" "rJ")] ;;
> desired value
Likewise.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
this bug box in the report. |
| Include the exact command that you entered. |
| Also include sources listed below. |
+==+
--
Andreas Schwab, sch
14: "strncpy" not declared in "CRTL"
> osint.adb:675:21: "strlen" not declared in "CRTL"
> osint.adb:728:16: "Open_Append" is undefined
> osint.adb:1108:41: "int64" not declared in "CRTL"
> osint.adb:3144:28: "strlen&q
1: "int64" not declared in "CRTL"
>> > osint.adb:3144:28: "strlen" not declared in "CRTL"
>> > osint.adb:3147:11: "strncpy" not declared in "CRTL"
>>
>> What's your bootstrap compiler?
>
> GNAT 4.8.5
10 | if ((scale + bias) != UINTVAL (operands[2]))
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -g conftest.c >&5
conftest.c: In function 'main':
conftest.c:104:13: error: 'loff_t' undeclared (first use in this function); did
you mean 'off_t'?
104 | if (sizeof (loff_t))
| ^~
| off_t
conftest.c:104:
On Jun 18 2022, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> What target?
aarch64-suse-linux, of course.
> What is the output of
>
> grep loff_t TARGET/libgo/gen-sysinfo.go
type ___loff_t int64
type _loff_t int64
type ___kernel_loff_t int64
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key finger
On Jun 21 2022, Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> which seems to be Linux 3.13 and glibc 4.8.4. On that system I see
That's stone age.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for somethi
On Mär 09 2021, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/users/jemarch/ctf-v4
User branches are located under refs/users.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A
all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [Makefile:1142: gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.o] Error 1
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
On Apr 02 2021, Martin Sebor wrote:
> One way to confirm this hypothesis might be to explicitly
> initialize the limit member in the ctor even the argument is
> ALLOCA_OK and see if the warning goes away.
Yes, it does.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fi
typedef array_type:'::va_list'
Written decl:-1 type_decl:'::va_list'
Wrote declaration entity:2 type_decl:'::va_list'
Wrote section:3 named-by:'::va_list'
Wrote fixed:80 record_type:'__va_list_tag'
Wrote fixed:80 record_type:'__va_list_tag'
Writing typedef type_decl:'::va_list'
Wrote GMF:-17 type_decl:'::va_list'@builtins
Indirect:-18 decl's type array_type:'::va_list'
Wrote typedef type_decl:'::va_list'
.12. Wrote fixed:80 record_type:'__va_list_tag'
.10. Wrote backref:-18 array_type:'::va_list'
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
rs many non-ASCII codepoints to be printable, but
- that logic is not easily ported to C. */
-print_str (rdm, (char *) &value, 1);
+{
+ /* Rust also considers many non-ASCII codepoints to be printable, but
+that logic is not easily ported to C. */
+ char c = value;
+ print_str (rdm, &c, 1);
+}
else
{
PRINT ("\\u{");
--
2.31.1
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
r new architecture added?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
#include
> #include
> -#include "ISO_Fortran_binding.h"
> +#include "../../../libgfortran/ISO_Fortran_binding.h"
Shoudn't that be fixed generically, by directing the compiler to use the
uninstalled headers?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GP
On Nov 14 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> python (I dunno, I can ‾\_(ツ)_/‾). The code:
Python support is optional.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
/operators/serialize.cc
execution test
tr1/7_regular_expressions/regex_traits/char/value.cc execution test
tr1/7_regular_expressions/regex_traits/wchar_t/value.cc execution test
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA
On Nov 15 2019, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Are these with the patch?
Yes.
> Are you on real hardware
No, I'm using aranym.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
.other/dyncast1.C -std=c++17 execution test
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
On Nov 15 2019, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I meant the compiler command line of course... for any -mcpu flags that
> might differ from my test run.
There are none.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
&q
res74
# of expected failures 708
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of unsupported tests 7419
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20191115/Build/gcc/xg++ version 10.0.0 20191114
(experimental) [trunk revision 278266] (GCC)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG K
expected passes26803
# of unexpected failures16
# of expected failures 82
# of unsupported tests 157
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20191116/Build/gcc/xg++ version 10.0.0 20191115
(experimental) [trunk revision 278320] (GCC)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux
erand" "=d")
(match_operator:QI 1 "ordered_comparison_operator"
[(zero_extract:SI (match_operand:BTST 2 ""
"")
(match_operand:SI 3 "const_int_operand" "n")
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
has support for ILP32.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
ized
>> error.
> OK. I had this internally, but haven't had time to analyze if the
> warnings was a false positive or not.
IMHO it is a false positive.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
valent.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
move.w. The following should fix
> it.
Apparently that also fixed the testsuite regressions.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
On Nov 25 2019, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/25/19 12:26 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Nov 24 2019, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Whew, I think I have it. One tst instruction eliminated when it
>>> shouldn't have been:
>>>
>>> mo
On Nov 25 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
> AFAICS this caused
>
> +FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check
>
> on Solaris. In libstdc++.log I find
That happens on all targets that don't support decimal float.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578
ined" does not
exist.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
)
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
On Nov 30 2022, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> char u[1] = { "x", "x" }; /* { dg-error {excess elements in 'char[1]'
> initializer} } */
That won't work, as '[1]' is a bracket expression only matching '1'.
You'll need {... &#
On Jan 05 2022, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The testcase uses SSE and SSE2 intrinsics, so fails on i686-linux
> if -msse2 isn't enabled by default. Fixed by adding -msse2 to
> dg-options.
Shouldn't that use { dg-require-effective-target sse2 }?
--
Andreas S
become visible to the
> programmer.
> * File operations on symbolic links::
> * File format of unformatted sequential files::
> * Asynchronous I/O::
> +* Behavior on integer overflow::o
s/o$//
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69
suite/gcc.target/m68k/tls-le.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/m68k/tls-le.c
index 74234e9e5a4..7a9f215f44b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/m68k/tls-le.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/m68k/tls-le.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! *-linux-* } } */
/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "jsr __m68k_read_tp" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "lea \\(foo@TLSLE,\%a0\\)" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "foo@TLSLE,%a0" } } */
static int __thread foo;
--
2.40.0
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
| "%<-march=%s%>: z*inx is conflict with float extensions",
| ^
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
prologue and
> epilogue code that uses
> library function calls. The default is to use fast inline prologues and
> epilogues.
>
> +@item -minline-atomics
> +@itemx -mno-inline-atomics
> +@opindex minline-atomics
@opindex should precede @item.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@
On Jul 17 2018, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> The mulu.l insn sets the CC according to the 64-bit result, but we are
> only using the high part, so the Z flag cannot be used. The other flags
> would still be valid, but we have no cc_status flag for that case.
>
> * conf
On Aug 03 2018, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
> Understood, thank you for the context. Let’s try to fix the underlying
> problem if you have issues with canadian crosses again. :-)
There should at least be a way to find the build gnatmake under a
different name.
Andreas.
--
Andreas
1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects
-DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 a.i == 4
gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line . a.j == 14
gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 a.i == 4
gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line . a.j == 14
gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 a.i == 4
gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line . a.j == 14
gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 a.i == 4
gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O0 line .+1 i == 5
gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 i == 5
gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 i == 5
gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none
-DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 i == 5
gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects
-DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 i == 5
gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 i == 5
gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 i == 5
gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line .+1 i == 5
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
long vll; }" } }
*/
/* { dg-final { gdb-test "@main" "type:foo" "struct foo { const long cli;
const signed char csc; }" } } */
/* { dg-final { gdb-test "@main" "type:cfoo" "const struct foo { const long
cli; const signed char csc; }&quo
On Aug 05 2018, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2018, MCC CS wrote:
>
>> this patch reduces calls to logarithm functions by
>> merging log a + log b => log a*b and
>
> this makes sense.
Even when a*b may overflow?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m
How about replacing clock_gettime with something else? It's not needed
for the particular test.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
eLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 64704bcd6d..e8f65c9791 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+2018-08-08 Andreas Schwab
+
+ PR target/46179
+ * config/m68k/m68k.h (FINAL_PRESCAN_INSN): Don't define.
+ * config/m68k/m68k.c (handle_move_doub
: %v\] @( 0x[0-9,a-f]+)+
-# 0x[0-9,a-f]+pprof\.allocateReflectTransient\+0x[0-9,a-f]+
.*/mprof_test.go:48
+# 0x[0-9,a-f]++pprof\.allocateReflectTransient\+0x[0-9,a-f]+
.*/mprof_test.go:48
`, memoryProfilerRun, (2<<20)*memoryProfilerRun, memoryProfilerRun,
(2<<20)*memoryProfil
p (rtx, rtx, HOST_WIDE_INT, bool);
extern const char *m68k_output_movem (rtx *, rtx, HOST_WIDE_INT, bool);
-extern void m68k_final_prescan_insn (rtx_insn *, rtx *, int);
extern bool m68k_epilogue_uses (int);
/* Functions from m68k.c used in constraints.md. */
--
2.18.0
--
Andreas Schwa
On Aug 09 2018, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> TestMemoryProfiler uses a too restrictive pattern that fails to match
>> backtraces that contain two tabs after the function address. That can
>> happen when the forma
LARGa1, 8*FLTS+1*PTRS(sp)
+
+/* restore and return */
+LARGra, FRAME_LEN-1*PTRS(sp)
+.cfi_restore 1
+LARGfp, FRAME_LEN-2*PTRS(sp)
+.cfi_restore 8
+addisp, sp, FRAME_LEN
+.cfi_def_cfa_offset 0
+ ret
+.cfi_endproc
+.size ffi_go_closure_asm, .-ffi_go_closure_asm
20 years now (see compilation-error-screen-columns).
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
On Aug 17 2018, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> In my Emacs, it jumps to column 8 (where the "a" is).
That's because there is no way to place it on column 1.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA
4(cnt&(1<>
sparcLinuxCntBits << 3)))
}
+ if GOARCH == "ia64" {
+ return (*lfnode)(unsafe.Pointer(uintptr((val >> ia64CntBits <<
3)&(1<<(64-3)-1) | val&^(1<<(64-3)-1
+ }
return (*lfnode)(unsafe.Pointer(uint
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-06/msg00297.html
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
On Jun 07 2017, Robin Dapp wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-06/msg00297.html
>
> What machine is this running on?
On a G5.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And
quot;> \\\[\[0-9.\]+%\\\]\\
> \\\[count:\\\[^:\\]*\\\]:\n *must_not_eliminate" 96 "optimized" { target { {
> ! ilp32 } && { ! lp64 } } } } }
It would be much easier to handle if the regex were enclosed in { }.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key finge
:_ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEEC2ESt16initializer_listIwERKS1_@@GLIBCXX_3.4.11
@@ -4003,6 +4005,7 @@ OBJECT:0:GLIBCXX_3.4.21
OBJECT:0:GLIBCXX_3.4.22
OBJECT:0:GLIBCXX_3.4.23
OBJECT:0:GLIBCXX_3.4.24
+OBJECT:0:GLIBCXX_3.4.25
OBJECT:0:GLIBCXX_3.4.3
OBJECT:0:GLIBCXX_3.4.4
OBJECT:0:GLIBCXX_3.4.5
--
2.13.1
--
Andreas Schwab, sch
w")])
>
> +(define_insn "*bsetdreg"
> + [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "+d")
I think you want "=d" insted of "+d". That fixes PR 80970.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
=
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr80970.c (nonexistent)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr80970.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+int a, b, c, d, e;
+void f ()
+{
+ long g, h;
+ if (c)
+e = d;
+ g = d & 31;
+ h = 1 << g;
+ a = e | h;
+ b = a;
+}
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
On Jun 20 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-cast.C -std=c++11 (test for errors, line 10)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-cast.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/con
dep r14=r50,r14,62,2;;
ad40: 09 00 38 10 98 11 [MMI] st8 [r8]=r14
ad46: 00 98 41 20 23 00 st4 [r16]=r51
ad4c: 00 00 04 00 nop.i 0x0;;
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerpri
at do_page_fault in arch/*/mm/fault.c, there are a lot of
architectures that place a limit on how far you can probe below USP.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
> function making calls with more than that might need additional probes,
> but that's going to be exceedingly rare.
With passing structures by value you can have arbitrary large
parameters.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9
../../libgo/sysinfo.c:106:
/usr/include/asm/ptrace.h:208:8: error: redefinition of 'struct
pt_all_user_regs'
struct pt_all_user_regs {
^~~~
In file included from ../../../libgo/sysinfo.c:66:0:
/usr/include/sys/ptrace.h:116:8: note: originally defined here
struct pt
/combine.c:11404
0x10f8ca7 try_combine
../../gcc/combine.c:3520
0x10fbcbb combine_instructions
../../gcc/combine.c:1275
0x10fbcbb rest_of_handle_combine
../../gcc/combine.c:14653
0x10fbcbb execute
../../gcc/combine.c:14698
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...
64_fpreg
+#define pt_all_user_regs pt_ia64_all_user_regs
#include
+#undef ia64_fpreg
+#undef pt_all_user_regs
#endif
#if defined(HAVE_LINUX_RTNETLINK_H)
#include
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
> options_re=
> for set in ${options}; do
> - for opt in `echo ${set} | sed -e 's_[/|]_ _g'`; do
> + for opt in `echo ${set} | sed -e 's_[/|]_ _g' | sed -e 's/\+/./g' `; do
No need to run two seds, just pass -e twice. Also, + isn't special, so
no
)
../../gcc/sel-sched.c:7637
0x410ff60f run_selective_scheduling()
../../gcc/sel-sched.c:7713
0x41a7e6cf ia64_reorg
../../gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c:9764
0x4105564f execute
../../gcc/reorg.c:3946
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG
\[0-9\]+"
> 4 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ror\tw\[0-9\]+, w\[0-9\]+, w\[0-9\]+"
> 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ror\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+"
> 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "and\tw\[0-9\]+
=====+
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
tion
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:26759
0x7aabef cp_parser_template_declaration_after_export
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:26778
0x7b11af cp_parser_declaration
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:12623
0x7b14f7 cp_parser_declaration_seq_opt
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:12550
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m
On Jul 04 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> checking whether compiler driver understands Ada... no
You need to fix that first.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
On Jul 04 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Configure seems to be able to find gnatbind/gnatmake as they are in /usr/bin.
Strange there are ada tools, but no ada compiler. Are you sure you
installed all relevant ada packages?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerpr
On Nov 07 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 06:27:52PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> * g++.dg/pr50763-3.C (evalPoint): Return a value.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00407.html
> (waiting for review)
Sorry, I missed that.
Andreas.
rch64*-*-*" } }
// { dg-xfail-if "" { *-*-* } { "-flto -fuse-linker-plugin" } { "" } }
-int
+void
search_line_fast (void)
{
__builtin_aarch64_im_lane_boundsi (4, 0, 0); /* { dg-error "" } */
--
2.15.0
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse
t
> options or force it internally are bfin, ft32, h8300, m68k - I've CCd the
> maintainers (it seems there is no-one for h8300).
For m68k, adding -fomit-frame-pointer by default is ok.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
0 t _ZL16function_summaryPK13coverage_infoPKc
3740 t _ZL16gcov_read_stringv
8940 t _ZL16generate_resultsPKc
7b80 t _ZL16get_cycles_countR9line_infob
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 2
xt, &cur_context, frames);
^~
../../../libgcc/config/ia64/unwind-ia64.c:2167:1: note: declared here
uw_install_context (struct _Unwind_Context *current __attribute__((unused)),
^~~~~~
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D
FAIL: g++.dg/pr82836.C (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/opt/gcc/gcc-20171118/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr82836.C:13:3: error: '__float128'
does not name a type; did you mean '__Float16x8_t'?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA
ily be confused with the macro which has
different semantics.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
(working copy)
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
if (this != r33) {
abort ();
}
+ return ConstructedObject();
}
int main()
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
rs6000.c:4187
0x10a8fdab rs6000_option_override_internal
../../gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c:4187
0x1017460b process_options
../../gcc/toplev.c:1234
0x1017460b do_compile
../../gcc/toplev.c:2015
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
rror: address register in load range
/tmp/cc9usHrI.s:296: Error: address register in load range
/tmp/cc9usHrI.s:307: Error: address register in load range
/tmp/cc9usHrI.s:316: Error: address register in load range
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7
: error:
alignment for 'foo2' must be at least 16
FAIL: g++.dg/pr53037-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20171208/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr53037-4.C:9:1: error:
alignment for 'void foo2()' must be at least 16
Andreas.
--
Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-12/msg00672.html
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
a prototype.
>
> I still don't get it. A function definition is also a declaration.
>
> Something very non-intuitive is happening?
`-Wmissing-prototypes (C and Objective-C only)'
Warn if a global function is defined without a previous prototype
declaration. This warning
ought to fix that, except that I don't have access to
> ia64 anymore and so can't test it. Andreas, could you try that?
That doesn't bootstrap, details in the PR.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88
));
+ gcc_assert (DEBUG_INSN_P (temp) || NOTE_P (temp));
}
else
{
--
2.15.1
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
401 - 500 of 1471 matches
Mail list logo
