[PATCH] includes, Darwin: Handle modular use for macOS SDKs [PR116827].

From: Iain Sandoe Tested on x86_64/aarch64 Darwin and x86_64-linux, OK for trunk? backports to branches supporting modules? thanks Iain --- 8< --- Recent changes to the OS SDKs have altered the way in which include guards are used for a number of headers when C++ modules are enabled. Instead o

[committed] d: Fix ICE type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED [PR117621]

Hi, r13-1104-gf4c3ce32fa54c1 introduced a regression, which had an accidental self assignment of TYPE_PACKED when it should have been assigned to the type's variants. This patch fixes that. Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu/-m32, committed to mainline, and backported to relea

[PATCH] toplevel, Makefile: Add missing CXX_FOR_TARGET export [PR88319].

Tested on x86_64-Linux, Darwin, OK for trunk? backports? thanks Iain --- 8< --- Actually, the issue is not local to the libitm case, it currently affects any 'cxx=true' top-level configured target library. The issue is a missing export of CXX_FOR_TARGET. PR libitm/88319 ChangeLog:

[patch,avr,applied] Add AVR-SD devices

Added the following 6 AVR-SD devices. Johann -- AVR: Add AVR-SD devices. gcc/ * config/avr/avr-mcus.def: Add AVR32SD20, AVR32SD28, AVR32SD32, AVR64SD28, AVR64SD32, AVR64SD48. * doc/avr-mmcu.texi: Rebuild.diff --git a/gcc/config/avr/avr-mcus.def b/gcc/config/avr/avr-mcus

Re: [PATCH] toplevel, Makefile: Add missing CXX_FOR_TARGET export [PR88319].

Hi Jeff, > On 23 Mar 2025, at 14:25, Jeff Law wrote: > On 3/23/25 8:03 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> Tested on x86_64-Linux, Darwin, >> OK for trunk? >> backports? >> thanks >> Iain >> --- 8< --- >> Actually, the issue is not local to the libitm case, it currently affects >> any 'cxx=true' top-level

RE: [PATCH] change cbl_field_data_t::etc_t::value from _Float128 to tree

Crossed in the mail. I applied your fixes below. The output of the one-liner program is now 1.2345678E+07, as expected. The .00 instead of .01 problem still exists; source code coming soon. UAT test failures down to 11 from 23. NIST failures holding steady at 273. > -Original Message-

Re: [PATCH][RFC] [cobol] change cbl_field_data_t::etc_t::value from _Float128 to tree

On Fri, 21 Mar 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 08:32:51AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > > So I really think we should go to mpfr, I can implement it tomorrow unless > > > Richi wants to do that. > > > > Go to mpfr for the string conversions? Yeah, maybe that's a good > >

[wwwdocs,applied] AVR: Mention more supported devices

Support for the AVR-SD devices (which are 1-liners) has been backported to v13 and v14. Johann -- gcc-13, gcc-14: AVR: Mention more new devices. diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html index 4860c500..e589e0d6 100644 --- a/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html +++ b/htdoc

Re: [PATCH] OpenMP: 'interop' construct - add ME support + target-independent libgomp

Thanks Sandra and Jakub for your comments. Here is attached an updated version of the patch: * Removed special case for n==1, now use an array even when only one interop object is passed. * Updated scan dumps; added C/C++ disjunction where needed. * Updated the signature of GOMP_interop to act

Re: [PATCH] change cbl_field_data_t::etc_t::value from _Float128 to tree

On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Robert Dubner wrote: > Real progress here. Preliminary report: > > I am still seeing trouble with a PIC PP9 variable coming back .000 instead > of 0.001. > > In my 679 UAT tests, the failure count is down from 23 to 4 > > In the NIST tests, the failure

[PATCH] cobol: Make CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET available to the libgcobol build.

I seek benediction. Failing that, I ask for advice. This patch makes it possible for me to set the environment variable 'CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-ggdb -O0"' at configure time, and end up with a debuggable libgcobol.so. Is this a correct way to gain that capability? If not, then how? If so, then O

New Croatian PO file for 'gcc' (version 15.1-b20250316)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted by the Croatian team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/hr.po (This file, 'gcc-15.1-b20250316.hr.po

[PATCH] libgcobol: Only use random_r if it is available [PR119295]

Tested on x86_64 and aarch64 Linux and x86_64 darwin, OK for trunk? thanks Iain This applies on top of https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678927.html --- 8< --- We do not have a replacement at the moment, so fall back to using regular random and friends. PR cobol/11929

RE: [PATCH] change cbl_field_data_t::etc_t::value from _Float128 to tree

Jim is back from a short COBOL-related business trip. I am going to take this working collection of patched patched patches and put it up where he can get at it. That location is the float_to_tree branch of https://gitlab.cobolworx.com/COBOLworx/gcc-cobol.git And we'll review it. We want to ma

[PATCH] OpenMP: Create additional interop objects with append_args.

This patch adds support for the case where #pragma omp declare variant with append_args is used inside a #pragma omp dispatch interop that specifies fewer interop args than required by the variant; new interop objects are implicitly created and then destroyed around the call to the variant, using t

Re: [PATCH] c++: Don't mix timevar_start and auto_cond_timevar for TV_NAME_LOOKUP [PR116681]

On 3/23/25 1:55 AM, Simon Martin wrote: Hi, On Sat Sep 14, 2024 at 10:00 AM CEST, Jason Merrill wrote: On 9/13/24 1:31 PM, Simon Martin wrote: We currently ICE upon the following testcase when using -ftime-report === cut here === template < int> using __conditional_t = int; template < typenam

[PATCH] RISC-V: xtheadmemidx: Split slli.uw pattern

The combine pass can generate an index like (and:DI (mult:DI (reg:DI) (const_int scale)) (const_int mask)) when XTheadMemIdx is available. LRA may pull it out, and thus a splitter is needed when Zba is not available. A similar splitter were introduced when XTheadMemIdx support was added, but remov

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Allow redirecting function calls to the same FMV clone

> On 24 Mar 2025, at 11:03, Andrew Carlotti wrote: > > Two brief comments, since I'm on holiday until 31st but happened to notice > this > patch anyway. > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 02:19:21AM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote: >> This behavior does not ensure that if any higher priority callee versio

Re: [patch] make vhdl known to the PPC backend

On 3/20/25 2:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:39 PM Matthias Klose wrote: >> >> For building ghdl, the compiler needs to be patched to know the "vhdl" >> language. Could that patch be applied to the upstream GCC, so that not >> everybody needs to patch GCC to build ghdl? >

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Allow redirecting function calls to the same FMV clone

Two brief comments, since I'm on holiday until 31st but happened to notice this patch anyway. On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 02:19:21AM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote: > This behavior does not ensure that if any higher priority callee version > were selected at runtime, then a higher priority caller version wo