On Sun, 29 Jan 2023, liuhongt wrote:
> The official name is AVX512-FP16.
>
> Ready to push to trunk.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/i386/i386.opt: Change AVX512FP16 to AVX512-FP16.
> * doc/invoke.texi: Ditto.
Ok, thank you.
(And okay to backport to older branches as/if you want.)
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023, liuhongt wrote:
> Ready to push to trunk.
Yes, thank you.
Gerald
Technically, this is seems to be a regression somewhere between 4.2 and
4.6 but, it seems, not enough for anyone to care too much. Tested on
various Darwin versions and x86_64, powerpc64 linux,
OK for trunk {now,stage1}?
thanks, Iain
--- 8< ---
For a regular compile job, with -v we emit the GCC
From: Lehua Ding
Hi Richard,
According to your previous comments, I adjusted the code. It will be easier (by
extend `get_inner_reg` function) to support the forwarding of new rtx operators
(e.g. sign-extend) in the future. Please help review this code, thank you so
much.
The current code doesn'
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (get_vector_mode): New function.
* config/riscv/riscv-v.cc (get_vector_mode): Ditto.
* config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc (enum lst_type): New enum.
(class loadstore): Adjust for indexed load
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/avl_single-72.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/avl_single-76.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/avl_single-77.c: New test.
---
.../riscv/rvv/vsetvl/avl_single-72.c | 27
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/vlxei-vsxei-constraint-1.c: New test.
---
.../riscv/rvv/base/vlxei-vsxei-constraint-1.c | 121 ++
1 file changed, 121 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/vlxei
Hello,
this is a fix for a gcc-12 ICE regression.
This ICE rings a bell to me, and I think the change by Tobias which
triggers it only uncovers a bug that can also happen independently in
other cases.
The problem is resolution of maxloc expressions is not idempotent, that
is resolution chang
Le 29/01/2023 à 05:17, Jerry DeLisle via Fortran a écrit :
Attached patch fixes this problem by allowing the namespace pointer to
be set correctly regardless of error condition.
Regression tested on x86_64_linux_gnu.
OK for trunk and backports?
Yes, thanks.
Hi Mikael,
Am 29.01.23 um 17:21 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Hello,
this is a fix for a gcc-12 ICE regression.
This ICE rings a bell to me, and I think the change by Tobias which
triggers it only uncovers a bug that can also happen independently in
other cases.
The problem is resolution of maxloc exp
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.target/riscv/rvv/base/vsoxei16-1.C: New test.
* g++.target/riscv/rvv/base/vsoxei16-2.C: New test.
* g++.target/riscv/rvv/base/vsoxei16-3.C: New test.
* g++.target/riscv/rvv/base/vsoxei8-1.C: New test.
* g++
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.target/riscv/rvv/base/vsoxei32-1.C: New test.
* g++.target/riscv/rvv/base/vsoxei32-2.C: New test.
* g++.target/riscv/rvv/base/vsoxei32-3.C: New test.
* g++.target/riscv/rvv/base/vsoxei64-1.C: New test.
* g+
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 02:29:04AM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 01:59:00PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > There is one bug that I noticed. When you use the full DMR instruction
> > > the
> > > constant copy propagation patch issues internal errors. I believe t
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:25 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> This patch adds a check in match_simplify_replacement to make sure the
> middlebb
> does not have any phi-nodes as we don't currently move those.
> This was just a thinko from before.
>
> Ok? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:35 PM Iain Sandoe via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Technically, this is seems to be a regression somewhere between 4.2 and
> 4.6 but, it seems, not enough for anyone to care too much. Tested on
> various Darwin versions and x86_64, powerpc64 linux,
> OK for trunk {now,stage1}
15 matches
Mail list logo
