On 5/15/21 9:01 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Some manual pages are already using C99 syntax for integral
types 'uint32_t', but some aren't. There are some using kernel
syntax '__u32'. Fix those.
Both the kernel and the standard types are 100% binary compatible,
and the source code differences
Hi Richard!
On 2021-04-19T20:28:31+0100, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> This patch adds target selectors of the form:
>
> { any-opts "opt1" ... "optn" }
> { no-opts "opt1" ... "optn" }
>
> for skipping or xfailing tests based on compiler options.
Nice!
> It only
> works for dg-
Bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
2020-12-10 Joern Rennecke
Fix bug in the define_subst handling that made match_scratch unusable for
multi-alternative patterns.
diff --git a/gcc/gensupport.c b/gcc/gensupport.c
index e1ca06dbc1e..4022c661adb 100644
--- a/gcc/gensupport.c
+++ b/gcc/g
When you have lots of operands and lots of alternatives in a pattern,
it is often not immediately apparent if the problem is in the
indicated alternative or in the one that genoutput uses as a reference
for the 'correct' number of alternatives, and/or if you dropped a
comma or had one too many. By
At the moment, for a match_dup in a define_cond_exec, you'd have to
give the number in the
resulting pattern(s) rather than in the substitute pattern. That's
not only wrong, but can also
be impossible when the pattern should apply to multiple patterns with
different operand numbers.
The attached
(Sorry about re-sending - I accidentally forgot to add a subject in
the last post, which would make it hard to have a meaningful thread.)
At the moment, for a match_dup in a define_cond_exec, you'd have to
give the number in the
resulting pattern(s) rather than in the substitute pattern. That's
n
At the moment, define_cond_exec allows only a single substitution
pattern. That is
rather limiting if the target needs to clobber a scratch register in
order to compute the
required condition.
The attached patch allows to add clobber patterns after the main
pattern, and also adds
support for MATCH
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 08:44:29PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> When eyeballing the r12-440 / bd1cd0d0e0fe / "Remove
> CC0" commit, I noticed parts that could be improved.
>
> Regarding the first change: at first I thought that just
> removing the word "better" was the best
> From: Segher Boessenkool
> Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 18:18:17 +0200
> On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 08:44:29PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > When eyeballing the r12-440 / bd1cd0d0e0fe / "Remove
> > CC0" commit, I noticed parts that could be improved.
> >
> > Regarding the firs
Bootstrapped regtested and on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
2021-02-22 Joern Rennecke
lra fix to reduce fatal spill failures.
* lra-constraints.c (split_reg): No longer static.
* lra-int.h (split_reg): Declare.
* lra-assigns.c (lra_split_hard_reg_for): Add strategy t
From: Andrew Pinski
While rewriting part of PHI-OPT to use match-and-simplify,
I ran into a bug where this pattern in match.pd would hit
and would produce invalid gimple; a shift of a pointer type.
This just disables this simplification for pointer types similarly
to what is already done in PHI-
For architectures with likely spilled register classes, neither
register allocator is guaranteed
to succeed when using optimization. If you have just a few files to
compile, you can try
by hand which compiler options will succeed and still give reasonable
code, but for large projects,
hand-tweakin
From: Andrew Pinski
Instead of some of the more manual optimizations inside phi-opt,
it would be good idea to do a lot of the heavy lifting inside match
and simplify instead. In the process, this moves the three simple
A?CST1:CST2 (where CST1 or CST2 is zero) simplifications.
OK? Boostrapped and
braced_list_to_string creates a host string, so it's not suitable when
e.g. the host
has 8 bit chars, but the target has 16 bit chars.
The attached patch checks if host and target char sizes are different
and in that case
falls back to leaving the array as an array.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-lin
On 5/16/21 7:57 AM, Joern Rennecke wrote:
When you have lots of operands and lots of alternatives in a pattern,
it is often not immediately apparent if the problem is in the
indicated alternative or in the one that genoutput uses as a reference
for the 'correct' number of alternatives, and/or if
When there is the possibility that overflow/wrap may happen on the loop index,
a few optimizations would not happen. For example code:
foo (int *a, int *b, unsigned k, unsigned n)
{
while (++k != n)
a[k] = b[k] + 1;
}
For this code, if "k > n", k would wrap. if "k < n" at begining,
it cou
This updates the mpfr version to 3.1.6 which is the last bugfix
release from the 3.1.x series and avoids printing the version
is buggy but acceptable from our configury.
Pushed.
2021-05-17 Richard Biener
contrib/
* download_prerequesites: Update mpfr version to 3.1.6.
* prereq
17 matches
Mail list logo