Hi Tobias,
For assumed shape, gfortran generates an "arg.0 = arg->data"
artificial variable – and with optional one has something like
if (arg != NULL && arg->data != NULL)
{
arg.0 = arg->data;
lbound.0 = ...
}
And an "if (present(arg))" becomes
"if (arg != NULL && arg->data !=
Hi Harald,
the attached should be mostly self-explaining. Division by zero handling
appeared to be incomplete. It was not dealt with properly when occurring
in declaration statements. We now try to handle this.
OK for mainline?
OK.
Thanks for the patch!
Regards
Thomas
Ping
On 03/05/2020 09:37, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Ping.
>
> There is a new mangle string "Nm" in the abi to denote the @live attribute,
> however will add support in a follow up patch.
>
>
> On 15 April 2020 12:04:29 CEST, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> Ping.
>>
>> On 0
Pushed.
Gerald
---
htdocs/readings.html | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/readings.html b/htdocs/readings.html
index 0dd27368..086baaa1 100644
--- a/htdocs/readings.html
+++ b/htdocs/readings.html
@@ -313,8 +313,8 @@ names.
Manufacturer: IBM
http
From: Kelvin Nilsen
Add new insns vextdu[bhw]vlx, vextddvlx, vextdu[bhw]vhx, and
vextddvhx, along with built-in access and overloaded built-in
access to these insns.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
regressions, using a Power9 configuration. Is this okay for
mast
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-10.1.0.sv.po', has ju
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 4:38 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2020 4:28:24 PM GMT+02:00, Alexander Monakov
> wrote:
> >On Fri, 8 May 2020, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> >> > Am I missing something?
> >>
> >> Is the above enough to declare min/max as IEEE compliant?
> >
> >No. SSE min/max instruc
On Sun, 10 May 2020, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> So, I found [1], that tries to explain this issue.
>
> [1] https://2pi.dk/2016/05/ieee-min-max
I would also recommend reading this report that covers a few more
architectures and issues with IEEE754 definitions:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/ANS
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the German team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/de.po
(This file, 'gcc-10.1.0.de.po', has jus
I just committed this patch.
François
On 03/03/20 10:11 pm, François Dumont wrote:
After the fix of PR 91910 I tried to consider other possible race
condition and I think we still have a problem.
Like stated in the PR when a container is destroyed all associated
iterators are made singular.
On 1/10/20, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Back in 2009 Manuel sent a patch to avoid useless -Wconversion warnings
> on compound assignment of types that get promoted to int:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg00582.html
>
> Joseph argued that those warnings are sometimes useful, and that t
Hi,
As analyzed in PR94969, data dependence analysis now misses dependence vector
for specific case in which DRs in DDR have the same invariant access functions.
This simple patch fixes the issue by also covering invariant cases. Bootstrap
and test on x86_64, is it OK?
Thanks,
bin
2020-05-11
12 matches
Mail list logo
