On 10/11/2018 04:38 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is a documentation-only patch to clarify the use case
of multiple distinct format_arg attributes on a single function.
It's far from obvious that the use case makes sense so explicitly
mentioning it sh
On 10/11/18 4:12 AM, Paul Hua wrote:
> Hi:
>
> The bug pr87156 make MIPS target bootstrap fail a month ago. The
> attached patch that posted under bugzilla by Jan Hubicka fixed the
> bug.
> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on mips64el-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> Considering that Jan not very a
On 10/11/18 5:48 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is simplification in ICF where we can use attribute comparison
> function from attrs.c instead of implementing our own.
>
> Patch survives tests on x86_64-linux-gnu.
> Ready for trunk?
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-10-10
On 10/11/18 2:58 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> While writing tests for attribute flatten I wasn't 100% sure
> from reading the manual if it would respect attribute noinline
> or if it would override it. Turns out it's the former so
> the attached patch mentions it in the manual. Unless there
> are ob
On 10/11/18 3:09 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
> Updated with an additional item I just debugged.
>
> Since the code that uses the doloop_end pattern does not check the operand
> mode as given in the pattern, the pattern itself may need to do this, and
> that was not documented. In addition, if the do
The manual says that:
The packed attribute specifies that a variable or structure
field should have the smallest possible alignment--one byte
for a variable, and one bit for a field...
The variable part doesn't actually reflect reality: GCC and all
other compilers I tested ignore the attri
On 10/11/18 9:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> The manual says that:
>
> The packed attribute specifies that a variable or structure
> field should have the smallest possible alignment--one byte
> for a variable, and one bit for a field...
>
> The variable part doesn't actually reflect reality:
On 9/27/18 8:13 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
>>> The error you would get if you do this is very confusing so I thought
>>> since it didn't matter much for the regexp only target triple tests
>>> that just accepting this would be fine.
>> Seems a good thing that that's a noisy failure; the function sh
On 10/8/18 11:12 AM, will wray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A PR to fix Bug 87364 - Pretty print of enumerator never prints the id,
> always falls back to C-style cast output
>
> The fix is tested with the code attached to the bug report and additional
> usage over the past few weeks.
>
> Bootstrap and regt
On 10/11/18 1:23 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 10/11/18 1:18 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> Ok, after working in gdb, I see that the PA-RISC port still uses reload
>> and not LRA, but it too seems to have the same issue of reusing input
>> regs that have REG_DEAD notes, so the question still stands.
On 8/7/18 2:00 PM, Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi wrote:
> Related with bug 86829, but for hyperbolic trigonometric functions.
> This patch adds substitution rules to both sinh(tanh(x)) -> x / sqrt(1
> - x*x) and cosh(tanh(x)) -> 1 / sqrt(1 - x*x). Notice that the both
> formulas has division by
On 10/11/18, Martin Sebor wrote:
> The manual says that:
>
>The packed attribute specifies that a variable or structure
>field should have the smallest possible alignment--one byte
>for a variable, and one bit for a field...
>
> The variable part doesn't actually reflect reality: GCC a
On 10/10/18, Martin Sebor wrote:
> While writing tests for fixes and enhancements for attribute
> handling I keep finding myself coming up with the same boiler-
> plate code to verify whether an attribute has or has not been
> successfully applied. It's often error-prone because it
> depends on t
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 05:37, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 10/8/18 11:12 AM, will wray wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A PR to fix Bug 87364 - Pretty print of enumerator never prints the id,
> > always falls back to C-style cast output
> >
> > The fix is tested with the code attached to the bug report and additi
On Oct 11, 2018, JonY <10wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/11/2018 02:57 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>>
>> Except that options typically don't get removed, just deprecated. It
>> seems cleaner to me to drop mingw from the name and make it default to
>> enabled for cygwin.
> It is already enabled for C
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:25 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:35:23AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > + /* [dcl.fct.spec]
> > > + "the constant-expression, if supplied, shall be a contextually
> > > + converted constant expression of type bool." */
Hi Tobias,
This is OK.
Thanks for the patch and the extra careful regtesting :-)
Paul
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 00:17, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Next patch, next try …
>
> The problem is the following: We have a use-associated symbol (a
> function) – which is once referenced (by use association).
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
