On June 24, 2016 8:34:01 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>My recent change to handle labels (other than forced/non-local) caused
>ICE on the following testcase, I thought EH pads would always differ
>with
>the special stuff in them for each region, but with
>__builtin_unreachable
>we can
On June 24, 2016 8:30:16 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>rewrite_expr_tree tries to reuse SSA_NAMEs if it knows they hold the
>same
>values, which it figures out by setting the changed flag during
>recursion
>if some operand is different. But in order for this to work reliably,
>we nee
Hi,
this is first of two patches for getting more realistic predictions of
recursive functions. It is clear that in order for recursion to finish, the
sum of frequencies of recursive calls should not exceed sum of frequencies of
the function entry block. This global condition is however bit hard
Hey,
As a first step of my GSOC project
(https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/replacelibibertywithgnulib) I have imported the
gnulib library inside the gcc tree. I have created gnulib as a top level
directory which contains the necessary scripts to import the modules. It also
contains the necessary Makefi
Hi,
this patch implements loop guard heuristics predicting that if one loop is
nested in another and controlled by a conditional that conditional is likely
false. This helps to get more realistic predictionsin larger loop nests.
To make predictor effective it is necessary to rule out duplicated lo
Jan Hubicka writes:
> Hi,
> this is first of two patches for getting more realistic predictions of
> recursive functions. It is clear that in order for recursion to finish, the
> sum of frequencies of recursive calls should not exceed sum of frequencies of
> the function entry block. This globa
> Jan Hubicka writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > this is first of two patches for getting more realistic predictions of
> > recursive functions. It is clear that in order for recursion to finish, the
> > sum of frequencies of recursive calls should not exceed sum of frequencies
> > of
> > the function entry
From: Andi Kleen
I have a Skylake system with MPX in the CPU, but MPX is disabled
in the kernel configuration.
This makes all the MPX tests fail because they assume if MPX
is in CPUID it works
Check the output of XGETBV too to detect non MPX kernels.
gcc/testsuite/:
2016-06-25 Andi Kleen
I think, that you missed the patch file or it was removed from your
email by server.
2016-06-25 14:06 GMT+02:00 ayush goel :
> Hey,
> As a first step of my GSOC project
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/replacelibibertywithgnulib) I have imported the
> gnulib library inside the gcc tree. I have create
The resolver for ifunc functions might resolve to a non-local function.
Tested on x86 and x86-64. OK for trunk?
H.J.
---
gcc/
PR middle-end/71524
* symtab.c (symtab_node::binds_to_current_def_p): Return false
for IFUNC resolver.
gcc/testsuite/
PR middle-end/715
This patch fixes PR71656 by adding support to rs6000_legitimize_reload_address
for POWER9 vector-dform addresses. Previously, -mpower9-dform-vector was
disabled when using reload due to this bug and it was not added to the default
ISA 3.0 flags. Now that -mpower9-dform-vector works with reload, I
11 matches
Mail list logo