On 2/27/2016 05:26, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 04:04 AM, JonY wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've submitted a patch that was committed as r227962, it causes some
>> unintended side effects (namely libuuid on Cygwin). Can someone please
>> revert?
>>
>> Kai still needs some time to setup his gcc developme
Thanks!
Patch committed as revision 233779 on trunk and as revision 233780 on
gcc-5-branch.
2016-02-26 19:14 GMT+01:00 Paul Richard Thomas :
> Dear Alessandro,
>
> Seconded! I saw your ping on my phone and was going to respond.
> well, now :-)
>
> Thanks for the patch
>
> Paul
>
> On 26 Febru
Hi!
I've noticed these tests fail on powerpc64*-linux (need -w, otherwise
the backend warns about ABI stuff (should have been probably -Wpsabi
note, but it isn't, and various tests in dg-torture are already using -w),
and one needa avx_runtime. Fixed thusly, committed as obvious to trunk.
2016-0
On 25-02-16 01:54, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
This patch from Steve on c.l.f
Fixes the segfault from attempting a string compare where there is no string
yet.
Regression tested on x86-64. New test case.
OK for trunk.
Regards,
Jerry
2016-02-24 Jerry DeLisle
Steven G. Kargl
On 02/27/2016 01:12 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 25-02-16 01:54, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>> This patch from Steve on c.l.f
>>
>> Fixes the segfault from attempting a string compare where there is no string
>> yet.
>>
>> Regression tested on x86-64. New test case.
>>
>> OK for trunk.
>>
>> Regards,
>
Update link for Openbench.
Applied.
Gerald
Index: benchmarks/index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/benchmarks/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.33 index.html
--- benchmarks/index.html 14 Nov 2015 21:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/25/2016 03:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>
>> So I fail to see how only successor edges are relevant. Isn't the
>> important
>> case to catch whether we remove an edge marked EDGE_IRREDUCIBLE_LOOP?
>> Even if the BB persists we might ha
