Re: Fix PR 67665: ICE when passing two empty files directly to cc1 with -g

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> Hi, >> The support -combine was removed a while back but cc1 still accepts >> more than one file if directly invoked. The support for multiple >> files has bit-rotten inside the C

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR63354

The testcase will need a slight adjustment, as currently it fails on powerpc64 with -m32 testing. Working on a fix. Bill On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 12:28 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Bill Schmidt > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Anton Blanchard proposed a fix to his own b

[wwwdocs] Introduce standard CSS for quoting e-mails

...and use it for projects/beginner.html. Observe how flexible CSS is, and with how little and logical annotation in the HTML file we can accomplish such effects! This fixes the issue of the new setting of gcc.gnu.org blocking local styles. Applied. Gerald Index: gcc.css

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR63354

Hi, On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 21:21 -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote: > The testcase will need a slight adjustment, as currently it fails on > powerpc64 with -m32 testing. Working on a fix. > > Bill > This patch adjusts the gcc.target/powerpc/pr63354 test to require 64-bit code generation, and also restr

Remove redundant unshare_expr from ipa-prop

Hi, There is a redundant unshare_expr in ipa-prop. Attached patch removes it. Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no new regressions. Is this OK for trunk? Thanks, Kugan gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-01-22 Kugan Vivekanandarajah * ipa-prop.c (ipa_set_jf_constant):

Re: [gomp4] Un-parallelized OpenACC kernels constructs with nvptx offloading: "avoid offloading"

Hi Jakub! On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:54:26 +0100, I wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 18:26:49 +0100, Tom de Vries > wrote: > > [...] [OpenACC] kernels region [...] > > that parloops does not manage to parallelize: > Telling from real-world code that we've been having a look at, when the > above situati

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Don't mark targets of unconditional jumps with side effects as FALLTHRU.

On 01/22/2016 12:10 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 01/21/2016 03:05 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> On 01/02/2016 08:16 PM, Marcin Kościelnicki wrote: >>> When an unconditional jump with side effects targets an immediately >>> following label, rtl_tidy_fallthru_edge is called. Since it has side >>> effect

<    1   2