Il 21/03/2014 18:05, Rainer Orth ha scritto:
The following patch adds it and indeed macro_list now is non-empty, as
expected. I'm just not sure if cc1 is the correct one in
gcc/Makefile.in, or if it should rather be $(COMPILERS) instead.
Anyway, with that patch a i386-pc-solaris2.10 bootstrap c
On March 22, 2014 2:40:37 AM CET, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>Minor dumping fix.
>Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for stage 1?
It's OK now.
Thanks,
Richard.
>Thanks,
>Teresa
>
>2014-03-21 Teresa Johnson
>
>* ipa-utils.c (ipa_print_order): Use specified dump file.
>
On March 21, 2014 9:30:25 PM CET, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>--with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan on i686-linux showed
>most often these two issues.
>
>The first one is that 32-bit signed time_t is multiplied by 1000, which
>overflows the int type. The result is then cast to unsigned, so even
>o
On March 21, 2014 9:32:54 PM CET, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>As MINUS_EXPR is not commutative, we really can't swap op0 with op1
>for testing whether subtraction overflowed, that is only possible for
>PLUS_EXPR, for MINUS_EXPR we really have to know if op1 is constant
>or negative or non-negativ
Can you add some documentation to gfortran.texi. I think we need to make
clear that for library extension, the flag used for compiling the main
program is relevant. Additionally, I believe some of the extensions are
always on while others are only enabled with a flag - if so, I think we
should
Mention gcc-ar, gcc-ranlib, gcc-nm in the documentation.
OK?
Tobias
2014-03-22 Tobias Burnus
* doc/invoke.texi (-flto): Expand section about
using static libraries with LTO.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 4c183a3..78ddde0 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 09:06:43AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/13/14 09:02, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >I've been told that the SC has approved the secondary platform list changes,
> >so I went ahead and committed the changes to our web pages.
> Thanks. I should have taken care of this a
Ping!
On 03/13/2014 11:54 AM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Ping!
On 03/06/2014 07:44 PM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Ping!
On 02/27/2014 11:44 AM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Ping!
On 02/20/2014 12:11 PM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Hello all,
Pinging this patch review request again. S
> Hi,
>
> This patch updates node's inline summary after edge_summary is
> updated. Otherwise it could lead to incorrect inline summary.
>
> Bootstrapped and gcc regression test on-going.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> Dehao
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2014-03-21 Dehao Chen
>
> *ipa-inline.c
> Hi!
>
> Here is an updated patch for what Tobias has posted earlier:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00043.html
> While that version bootstrapped/regtested fine, most of the Fortran
> tests ICEd, primarily because the 3 operand __builtin_expect wasn't being
> removed from the IL a
10 matches
Mail list logo