Re: [RFA/RFC patch]: Follow-up on type-demotion pass ...

On 11/18/13 15:55, Joseph S. Myers wrote: * Going just on the general description of the pass and not looking at the details: does this do any of the things that are done by shorten_binary_op or shorten_compare in c-common.c? If so, do you plan followup changes to remove as premature optimizatio

Re: [RS6000] strict alignment for little-endian

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:14:04PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:54:39AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > > I'd like to remove -mstrict-align for little-endian powerpc, because > > the assumption that mis-aligned accesses are massively slow isn't true > > for current powerpc

Re: [PATCH] Use libbacktrace as libsanitizer's symbolizer

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:17:41AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > In file included from /tmp/x/gcc/libbacktrace/atomic.c:37: > /tmp/x/gcc/libbacktrace/internal.h:182: error: expected declaration > specifiers or '...' before 'off_t' > make[3]: *** [atomic.lo] Error 1 > > brgds, H-P > PS. Host

Re: [PATCH] Use libbacktrace as libsanitizer's symbolizer

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:32:12PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:17:41AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > In file included from /tmp/x/gcc/libbacktrace/atomic.c:37: > > /tmp/x/gcc/libbacktrace/internal.h:182: error: expected declaration > > specifiers or '...' before 'o

<    1   2   3