On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
* compare-elim.c (find_comparisons_in_bb): Eliminate only compares
having mode compatible with the mode of previous compare. Substitute
compare mode of previous compare with the mode, compatible
El 12 de febrer de 2012 1:09, Gerald Pfeifer ha escrit:
> Given that both Mike and me considered this patch on the obvious
> side, I now committed the following variation thereof on trunk.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 08:23:45PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >I missed the regeneration of libitm/configure the first time. The
> > p2.diff with the regenerated libitm/configure passes make check in libitm
> > now on x86_64-apple-darwin11...
>
> Great, thanks for the testing.
Eric,
The
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Add note on thread improvements to libstdc++ changes.
Nice. I have a hunch that many will be interested to learn which
targets are now benefiting from this. Do you have a list, even if
not complete to add there?
Gerald
Index: changes.html
==
Hello,
there was no specific handling for absent arrays passed as argument to
elemental procedures. So, because of scalarisation, we were passing an
array element reference of a NULL pointer which was failing.
These patches add a conditional to pass NULL when the data pointer is
NULL. Norm
Applied.
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.832
diff -u -3 -p -r1.832 index.html
--- index.html 8 Feb 2012 23:31:02 - 1.832
+++ index.html 12 Feb 2012 18:54:4
This was totally suitable for when it was written; us now having
had this in place for ages and approaching GCC 4.7, make this a
bit shorter, by about a fourth, and make the context in time more
explicit.
Applied.
Gerald
Index: develop.html
===
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-4.7-b20120128.sv.po',
Ping ?
2012/1/27 Fabien Chêne :
> Hi Gerald,
>
> 2012/1/13 Fabien Chêne :
> [...]
>>> Mind suggesting a snippet for our release notes at
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html ?
>>
>> Yes, sure, thanks for suggestion. Unfortunately, my machine is
>> currently down, I'll get back to you when i
Hi,
this adds a SPARC (V9 only) port to the library. Straightforward, except that
the unusual setup of _ITM_beginTransaction's frame consistently crashes GDB if
it is fully described in the CFI. Since backtracing through that frame isn't
very likely to happen in real life, I have left it as-i
Word-mode paradoxical subregs have been problematic on big-endian architectures
for ages, and the PA and SPARC ports have a workaround for this in the form of
the CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS macro. The SPARC one was more limited in scope,
but 10 ACATS tests fail at -O2 on the mainline because of t
This is in preparation of some potentially future changes in
relation to the currently confusing naming of Stages 1 and 3.
It reduces references to concrete stages and slightly reformats
here and there.
Committed.
Gerald
Index: develop.html
==
Hello,
this is the next PR50981 fix:
when passing polymorphic scalar actual arguments to elemental
procedures, we were not adding the "_data" component reference.
The fix is straightforward; checking that the expression's type is
BT_CLASS was introducing regressions, so this patch uses a helper
...on the steering committee web page, as suggested by Marc.
Applied.
Gerald
Index: steering.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/steering.html,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -3 -p -r1.34 steering.html
--- steering.html
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the German team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/de.po
(This file, 'gcc-4.7-b20120128.de.po', h
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Checked in the shortened version and changes. How thats?
> seems better :-)
Yep, thanks! There is just a minor grammor I went ahead fixing.
On the title page, I was thinking to refer to the release notes
entry (gcc-4.7/changes.html), and would make
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Fabien Chêne wrote:
> I get back to you for the snippet about deprecated access
> declarations. I would also find it sensible to advertise about the fix
> of c++/14258, a popular bug I have hit myself many times. OK to commit
> the below ?
Yes, thank you.
One suggestion: wher
On 12 February 2012 18:25, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Add note on thread improvements to libstdc++ changes.
>
> Nice. I have a hunch that many will be interested to learn which
> targets are now benefiting from this. Do you have a list, even if
> not com
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> I've committed this patch to describe the MIPS changes in GCC 4.7.
> Corrections, comments, and help with wordsmithing are all welcome.
Nice! How about the small follow-up below?
Gerald
Index: changes.html
==
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> "Support for...has been added" (also typo: beed -> been)
Hmm, this still seems to be in the latest version?
> Is "C code" better? Or C-code? Without the extension, inline assembler
> must be used to get correct code, using C like a = b or
> pstruc
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, François Dumont wrote:
> I have created yesterday the libstdcxx_so_7-2-branch in the gcc repo
> that only contains the libstdc++-v3 folder. This branch will contain all
> the abi breaking changes that are plan to be moved to trunk as soon as
> the decision to break the ab
And here is the change to MAINTAINERS I just committed.
2012-02-12 Gerald Pfeifer
* MAINTAINERS (Various Maintainers): Add Diego Novillo,
Gerald Pfeifer and Joseph Myers as docstring relicensing
maintainers.
Index: MAINTAINERS
==
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>* doc/install.texi (Prerequisites): Suggest building GMP, MPFR and
>MPC as part of GCC before describing configuring with --with-gmp etc.
>(Installing GCC: Configuration): State that --with-gmp etc. aren't
>needed if source
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> My 2c - I heartily recommend this patch.
> Thanks. I'm a bit surprised noone else has commented - I hoped this
> would be a no-brainer, or at least get some constructive feedback for
> further improvement.
One reason surely is that the diffs for chang
On 12 February 2012 23:43, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> My 2c - I heartily recommend this patch.
>> Thanks. I'm a bit surprised noone else has commented - I hoped this
>> would be a no-brainer, or at least get some constructive feedback for
>> further impr
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Jayant R. Sonar wrote:
> After making some minor changes related to build problems, I have
> checked-in the CR16 GCC port yesterday.
How about a news item on our main web page, and release notes
entry under gcc-4.7/changes.html? Details on how to create
changes for our web pa
Ping...
Thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org]
On
> Behalf Of Bin Cheng
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 4:29 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH ARM] backport r174803 from trunk to 4.6 branch
>
> Hi,
> J
27 matches
Mail list logo
