> This looks OK to me.
I obviously didn't look carefully enough, there are a few thinkos in the
output_constructor_bitfield hunk:
- if (shift < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
- && shift + this_time > HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
- {
- this_time = shift + this_time -
> Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port
> and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through
> the entire patch.This patch covers the half of the rtl code.
This looks OK to me.
--
Eric Botcazou
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and
front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through the
entire patch.This patch covers the half of the rtl code.
Ok?
* dojump.c
(prefer_and_bit_test): Use wide-int interfaces.
