on 2022/10/24 20:55, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:43 PM Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As PR107338 shows, with the use of widening loads, the
>> container_type can become a wider type, it causes us to
>> get wrong shift_n since the BIT_FIELD_REF offset actually
>> becomes b
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:43 PM Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As PR107338 shows, with the use of widening loads, the
> container_type can become a wider type, it causes us to
> get wrong shift_n since the BIT_FIELD_REF offset actually
> becomes bigger on BE. Taking the case in PR107338 as
> examp
Hi,
As PR107338 shows, with the use of widening loads, the
container_type can become a wider type, it causes us to
get wrong shift_n since the BIT_FIELD_REF offset actually
becomes bigger on BE. Taking the case in PR107338 as
example, at the beginning the container type is short and
BIT_FIELD_REF
