On 19/06/20 12:17 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/06/20 12:49 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Anyway, while I blame the compiler for not generating very good code
with the current implementation, I believe the change can be seen as
a simplification and should be pushed to master. It regtests fine
On 19/06/20 12:49 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
I am proposing a small tweak to the implementation of __includes,
which in my application saves 20% of the running time. I noticed it
because using range-v3 was giving unexpected performance gains.
The unified diff is attached, but let me fi
Hello,
I am proposing a small tweak to the implementation of __includes, which in
my application saves 20% of the running time. I noticed it because using
range-v3 was giving unexpected performance gains.
The unified diff is attached, but let me first show a more readable
context diff.
***
