On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 03:06:42PM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 13:12 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > (define_insn "addg6s"
> > [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> > (unspec:GPR [(match_operand:GPR 1 "register_operand" "r")
> > (ma
On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 13:12 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:20:18PM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> > For PR100693, we currently provide an addg6s builtin using unsigned
> > int arguments, but we are missing an unsigned long long argument
> > equivalent. This pa
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:20:18PM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> For PR100693, we currently provide an addg6s builtin using unsigned
> int arguments, but we are missing an unsigned long long argument
> equivalent. This patch adds an overload to provide the long long
> version of the builtin.
>
Hi,
RFC/Update support for addg6s instruction. PR100693
For PR100693, we currently provide an addg6s builtin using unsigned
int arguments, but we are missing an unsigned long long argument
equivalent. This patch adds an overload to provide the long long
version of the builtin.
unsigned long lo
