On 06/16/2011 08:25 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c (working copy)
>
> (Not a dbr target...)
>
>> Ok?
>
> NO! They're still used by reorg.c+resource.c
Already handled:
rest_of_pass_free_cfg (void)
{
#ifdef DELAY_SLOTS
/* The resource.c machinery uses DF but the
On 06/16/2011 05:25 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> We're updating REG_DEAD notes in regrename.c, but it seems this is for
>> historical reasons only. As far as I can tell, every pass that needs
>> such notes recomputes them with df_note_add_problem/df_a
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> We're updating REG_DEAD notes in regrename.c, but it seems this is for
> historical reasons only. As far as I can tell, every pass that needs
> such notes recomputes them with df_note_add_problem/df_analyze, and the
> following patch bootstrapped and test
On 06/16/2011 07:33 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> * regrename.c (do_replace): Don't update notes.
Ok.
r~
We're updating REG_DEAD notes in regrename.c, but it seems this is for
historical reasons only. As far as I can tell, every pass that needs
such notes recomputes them with df_note_add_problem/df_analyze, and the
following patch bootstrapped and tested successfully on i686-linux (some
random libmudf
