On 12/03/14 11:48, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 19:31 -0500, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
I think the jit patches introduced a problem when you rebuild within a
directory that contains an old build (i.e., no brand new build
directory). The gcc/Makefile creates a symlink for xgcc with th
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 19:31 -0500, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I think the jit patches introduced a problem when you rebuild within a
> directory that contains an old build (i.e., no brand new build
> directory). The gcc/Makefile creates a symlink for xgcc with the full
> driver name without first re
I think the jit patches introduced a problem when you rebuild within a
directory that contains an old build (i.e., no brand new build
directory). The gcc/Makefile creates a symlink for xgcc with the full
driver name without first removing the symlink. The right procedure
(gathered from other Mak
