On 10/29/14 17:48, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/11/2014 05:58 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
It turns out that we're calling eliminate_regs for global variables
which
can't possibly have eliminable regs in their decl. At that point,
reg_eliminate
On 09/11/2014 05:58 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
It turns out that we're calling eliminate_regs for global variables which
can't possibly have eliminable regs in their decl. At that point,
reg_eliminate can be NULL. This patch avoids unnecessar
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> It turns out that we're calling eliminate_regs for global variables which
> can't possibly have eliminable regs in their decl. At that point,
> reg_eliminate can be NULL. This patch avoids unnecessary work, and allows us
> to add an assert to
It turns out that we're calling eliminate_regs for global variables
which can't possibly have eliminable regs in their decl. At that point,
reg_eliminate can be NULL. This patch avoids unnecessary work, and
allows us to add an assert to eliminate_regs later.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-l
