> What is the rational for having --with-zlib but --with-libz-prefix
> (ie zlib vs libz) ? Looks not very consistent.
I agree it's unfortunate, but it is unavoidable if I want to keep the
current option as it is (compatibility), and reuse AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS
(which is a fairly complex function)
> On 21 Jan 2015, at 08:47, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>
> Thank you! :)
What is the rational for having --with-zlib but --with-libz-prefix
(ie zlib vs libz) ? Looks not very consistent.
Tristan.
>
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:45:48PM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch enha
