Re: ping: [PATCH] libcpp: Improve location for macro names [PR66290]

2023-06-19 Thread Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches
May I please ping this one? FWIW, it's 10 months old now without any feedback. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/607647.html Most of the changes are just adapting the testsuite to look for the improved diagnostic location. Otherwise it's a handful of lines in libcpp and it ju

ping: [PATCH] libcpp: Improve location for macro names [PR66290]

2023-01-12 Thread Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/607647.html May I please ping this one again? It will enable closing out the PR. Thanks! -Lewis On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 9:22 AM Lewis Hyatt wrote: > > Hello- > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/599397.html > > May I ple

Ping: [PATCH] libcpp: Improve location for macro names [PR66290]

2022-09-15 Thread Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches
Hello- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/599397.html May I please ping this patch? Thank you. -Lewis On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 12:14 PM Lewis Hyatt wrote: > > > When libcpp reports diagnostics whose locus is a macro name (such as for > -Wunused-macros), it uses the location in