Re: backported patch for PR69614

2016-04-01 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 04/01/2016 01:39 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 1 April 2016 at 19:34, Vladimir Makarov wrote: O Sorry, I tried to reproduce it on today trunk on a real hardware but I've failed. You have hardware running big-endian natively? Oops, I missed that it is a big endian machine. Thanks.

Re: backported patch for PR69614

2016-04-01 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 1 April 2016 at 19:34, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > On 03/31/2016 05:35 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> >> On 30 March 2016 at 18:01, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >>> >>>The patch for PR69614 has been backported to gcc-5 branch: >>> >>>

Re: backported patch for PR69614

2016-04-01 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 03/31/2016 05:35 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 30 March 2016 at 18:01, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The patch for PR69614 has been backported to gcc-5 branch: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 Committed as rev. 234577. Hi, As I've already reported: https://gcc.gn

Re: backported patch for PR69614

2016-03-31 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 30 March 2016 at 18:01, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > The patch for PR69614 has been backported to gcc-5 branch: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 > > Committed as rev. 234577. > Hi, As I've already reported: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/20

backported patch for PR69614

2016-03-30 Thread Vladimir Makarov
The patch for PR69614 has been backported to gcc-5 branch: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 Committed as rev. 234577.

Re: patch for PR69614

2016-03-14 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 12 March 2016 at 18:17, Jeff Law wrote: > On 03/12/2016 07:56 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >> >>The following patch should solve the PR which is discussed on >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 >> >>The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64. >> >>Commit

Re: patch for PR69614

2016-03-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 03/12/2016 07:56 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch should solve the PR which is discussed on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64. Committed as rev. 234162. Isn't this potentially a problem for the gc

Re: patch for PR69614

2016-03-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 09:56:54AM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > +2016-03-12 Vladimir Makarov > + > + PR target/69614 > + * lra-constraints.c (delete_move_and_clobber): New. > + (remove_inheritance_pseudos): Use it. Thanks for working on this. > --- lra-constraints.c (revision 2

patch for PR69614

2016-03-12 Thread Vladimir Makarov
The following patch should solve the PR which is discussed on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64. Committed as rev. 234162. Index: ChangeLog === --- ChangeL