WIP Move 'pass_fast_rtl_dce' from 'pass_postreload' into 'pass_late_compilation' (was: nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594])

Hi! On 2024-06-28T00:41:54+0200, I wrote: > On 2024-06-27T23:20:18+0200, I wrote: >> On 2024-06-27T22:27:21+0200, I wrote: >>> On 2024-06-27T18:49:17+0200, I wrote: On 2023-10-24T19:49:10+0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This patch adds a combine pass that runs late in the pipeline

Re: nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594]

Hi Richard! On 2024-06-28T17:48:30+0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Richard Sandiford writes: >> Thomas Schwinge writes: >>> On 2024-06-27T23:20:18+0200, I wrote: On 2024-06-27T22:27:21+0200, I wrote: > On 2024-06-27T18:49:17+0200, I wrote: >> On 2023-10-24T19:49:10+0100, Richard

Re: nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594]

Richard Sandiford writes: > Thomas Schwinge writes: >> Hi! >> >> On 2024-06-27T23:20:18+0200, I wrote: >>> On 2024-06-27T22:27:21+0200, I wrote: On 2024-06-27T18:49:17+0200, I wrote: > On 2023-10-24T19:49:10+0100, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> This patch adds a combine pass tha

Re: nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594]

Thomas Schwinge writes: > Hi! > > On 2024-06-27T23:20:18+0200, I wrote: >> On 2024-06-27T22:27:21+0200, I wrote: >>> On 2024-06-27T18:49:17+0200, I wrote: On 2023-10-24T19:49:10+0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This patch adds a combine pass that runs late in the pipeline. >>> >>>

RE: nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594]

.@ventanamicro.com; rdapp@gmail.com; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; > Tom de Vries ; Roger Sayle > Subject: Re: nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594] > > Hi! > > On 2024-06-27T22:27:21+0200, I wrote: > > On 2024-06-27T18:49:17+0200, I wrote: > >> On 2023-10-

Re: nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594]

Hi! On 2024-06-27T23:20:18+0200, I wrote: > On 2024-06-27T22:27:21+0200, I wrote: >> On 2024-06-27T18:49:17+0200, I wrote: >>> On 2023-10-24T19:49:10+0100, Richard Sandiford >>> wrote: This patch adds a combine pass that runs late in the pipeline. >> >> [After sending, I realized I replied

Re: nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594]

Hi! On 2024-06-27T22:27:21+0200, I wrote: > On 2024-06-27T18:49:17+0200, I wrote: >> On 2023-10-24T19:49:10+0100, Richard Sandiford >> wrote: >>> This patch adds a combine pass that runs late in the pipeline. > > [After sending, I realized I replied to a previous thread of this work.] > >> I've

Re: nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594]

Hi! On 2024-06-27T18:49:17+0200, I wrote: > On 2023-10-24T19:49:10+0100, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> This patch adds a combine pass that runs late in the pipeline. [After sending, I realized I replied to a previous thread of this work.] > I've beek looking a bit through recent nvptx target c

nvptx vs. [PATCH] Add a late-combine pass [PR106594]

Hi! On 2023-10-24T19:49:10+0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This patch adds a combine pass that runs late in the pipeline. Great! In context of 'nvptx vs. "fwprop: invoke change_is_worthwhile to judge if a replacement is worthwhile"', I've beek looking a bit thr