On 10/12/2014 00:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I still say the change to "if __GLIBC__ > 2 || __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 20"
is simply wrong. It works for me with 2.18, but if it doesn't work
with 2.19 on Debian then why should it work any better with 2.20?
Yes, it was indeed a wild guess because I di
On 09/12/14 23:24 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/12/14 20:34 +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/12/14 23:53 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
After having installed all necessary locales on my system I
end up with 4 failures. Here is a patch to fix th
On 09/12/14 20:34 +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/12/14 23:53 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
After having installed all necessary locales on my system I end
up with 4 failures. Here is a patch to fix them all.
Did you discover why only you are seei
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/12/14 23:53 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
After having installed all necessary locales on my system I end up with
4 failures. Here is a patch to fix them all.
Did you discover why only you are seeing failures?
Not just him, anyone with a d
On 08/12/14 23:53 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
After having installed all necessary locales on my system I end up
with 4 failures. Here is a patch to fix them all.
Did you discover why only you are seeing failures?
The whole testsuite passes for me, with glibc 2.18, including the
tests you
Hi
After having installed all necessary locales on my system I end up
with 4 failures. Here is a patch to fix them all.
For numpunct test I consider that checking value of numpunct::grouping()
result was not correct. libstdc++ doesn't control this value. I prefer
to just check that value
