[ja...@redhat.com: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Fix up vect-simd-clone1[678]*.c tests [PR108898]]

2023-03-21 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
--- Begin Message --- On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:35:19PM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > > @@ -82,8 +82,7 @@ main () > > /* Ensure the the in-branch simd clones are used on targets that support > > them. > > Some targets use another call for the epilogue loops. */ > > -/* { dg-final { scan-

[ja...@redhat.com: Re: [PATCH] Fix -fcompare-debug due to DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs (PR debug/83419)]

2017-12-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
--- Begin Message --- On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:35:07PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:17:18PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > One option would be to deal with that in pop_stmt_list and the C++ caller > > thereof, where we right now have: > > > > /* If the stateme

Re: ja...@redhat.com

2012-04-30 Thread Jason Merrill
On 04/30/2012 04:38 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: This makes sense to me. Thanks (and sorry for bogus subject). I bootstrapped/regtested the change and tested it indeed lets me build kernel and Mozilla with the sanity check that there are no function<->variable aliases. Is the change OK? OK. Jason

Re: ja...@redhat.com

2012-04-30 Thread Jan Hubicka
> This makes sense to me. Thanks (and sorry for bogus subject). I bootstrapped/regtested the change and tested it indeed lets me build kernel and Mozilla with the sanity check that there are no function<->variable aliases. Is the change OK? Honza > > Jason

Re: ja...@redhat.com

2012-04-30 Thread Jason Merrill
This makes sense to me. Jason

ja...@redhat.com

2012-04-26 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, I would like to remove old code handling aliases. The catch is that in new representation I am not accepting aliases from functions to variables or vice versa. It is not impossible to add, but it is another weird side case (for exmaple you can then call variable). I know of only one case whe