On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> configure:23559: checking assembler for thread-local storage support
I don't expect anyone to work on this, but such a configure test is silly
- it's a test where a failure is more likely to indicate the test is buggy
than that the feature teste
Hi!
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:53:58 -0700, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
> > --- gcc/acinclude.m4
> > +++ gcc/acinclude.m4
> > @@ -444,8 +444,16 @@ AC_DEFUN([gcc_GAS_FLAGS],
> > [AC_CACHE_CHECK([assembler flags], gcc_cv_as_flags,
> > [ case "$target"
cated above), or is the following patch
> the way to go, or something else? H.J., the gnux32 change is just a
> guess; please comment if that's not right. (And, of course, this is not
> a problem specific to *-*-linux*, but changing that is for another day.)
>
> gcc/
>
s --64 to the
assembler (à la ASM_SPEC as indicated above), or is the following patch
the way to go, or something else? H.J., the gnux32 change is just a
guess; please comment if that's not right. (And, of course, this is not
a problem specific to *-*-linux*, but changing that is fo
