On 08/12/2016 01:17 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Note that for the main patch I don't like the current state of the
divmod libcall issue. I think we need to solve this in a more
reasonable manner and not expose this oddness to a GIMPLE level pass.
I haven't looked at the main patch at all.
Any
On 12 August 2016 at 12:47, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> On 08/09/2016 04:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> > ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg01869.html
>> This seems to be dependent upon other patches, this is not OK until all
>> prereqs
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/09/2016 04:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg01869.html
> This seems to be dependent upon other patches, this is not OK until all
> prereqs are resolved.
>
> You're using SI/DI in the descriptions,
On 08/09/2016 04:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg01869.html
This seems to be dependent upon other patches, this is not OK until all
prereqs are resolved.
You're using SI/DI in the descriptions, but then using more traditional
C types like i
ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg01869.html
Thanks,
Prathamesh
On 28 July 2016 at 19:07, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
> The following patch adds test-cases for divmod transform.
> I separated the SImode tests into separate file from DImode tests
> because certain arm config
Hi,
The following patch adds test-cases for divmod transform.
I separated the SImode tests into separate file from DImode tests
because certain arm configs (cortex-15) have hardware div insn for
SImode but not for DImode,
and for that config we want SImode tests to be disabled but not DImode tests.
