On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Similarly, I
> don't see div as a builtin in that file, only FILE* has special code,
> but
> that doesn't seem worth the trouble here. So I am only declaring the 5
> "simple" f
On Fri, 26 May 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
Similarly, I
don't see div as a builtin in that file, only FILE* has special code, but
that doesn't seem worth the trouble here. So I am only declaring the 5
"simple" functions, with minimal properties: leaf, nothrow, and for
fegetround pure (glibc alre
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Marc Glisse
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> coming back to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01378.html ,
>>> Richard wanted a complete set of fenv
On Fri, 26 May 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
coming back to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01378.html ,
Richard wanted a complete set of fenv functions instead of just the 2 I was
interested in. However, most functions i
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> coming back to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01378.html ,
> Richard wanted a complete set of fenv functions instead of just the 2 I was
> interested in. However, most functions in fenv.h handle a struch fenv_t or
> f
Hello,
coming back to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01378.html ,
Richard wanted a complete set of fenv functions instead of just the 2 I
was interested in. However, most functions in fenv.h handle a struch
fenv_t or fexcept_t, which makes them inconvenient to handle as builtins
