Ok.
Thanks,
Kyrill
From: Stam Markianos-Wright
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2023 12:42 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; Richard Earnshaw
Subject: [PING][PATCH] arm: Remove unsigned variant of vcaddq_m
(Pinging since I realised that this is required for my later Low
, 2023 6:21 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Richard Earnshaw ; Kyrylo Tkachov
Subject: arm: Remove unsigned variant of vcaddq_m
Hi all,
The unsigned variants of the vcaddq_m operation are not needed within the
compiler, as the assembly output of the signed and unsigned versions of the
ops is
Hi Stam,
On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 19:22, Stamatis Markianos-Wright via Gcc-patches <
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The unsigned variants of the vcaddq_m operation are not needed within the
> compiler, as the assembly output of the signed and unsigned versions of the
> ops is identic
OT90_S VHCADDQ_ROT270_S])
-(define_int_iterator VxCADDQ_M [VHCADDQ_ROT90_M_S VHCADDQ_ROT270_M_S
VCADDQ_ROT90_M_U VCADDQ_ROT90_M_S VCADDQ_ROT270_M_U VCADDQ_ROT270_M_S])
+(define_int_iterator VxCADDQ_M [VHCADDQ_ROT90_M_S VHCADDQ_ROT270_M_S
VCADDQ_ROT90_M VCADDQ_ROT270_M])
(define_int_iterator V
