On 10/24/2016 06:16 PM, Moritz Klammler wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
On 10/24/2016 02:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Moritz Klammler wrote:
I would like to bump my patch that makes the
`contrib/download_prerequisites` script verify the checksums of the
downloaded pa
Jeff Law writes:
> On 10/24/2016 02:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>>> I would like to bump my patch that makes the
>>> `contrib/download_prerequisites` script verify the checksums of the
>>> downloaded packages and augments it with a few a
On 10/24/2016 02:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Moritz Klammler wrote:
I would like to bump my patch that makes the
`contrib/download_prerequisites` script verify the checksums of
the downloaded packages and augments it with a few additional options.
All feedback I
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Moritz Klammler wrote:
> I would like to bump my patch that makes the
> `contrib/download_prerequisites` script verify the checksums of
> the downloaded packages and augments it with a few additional options.
> All feedback I have received has been incorporated. Is
I would like to bump my patch that makes the
`contrib/download_prerequisites` script verify the checksums of
the downloaded packages and augments it with a few additional options.
All feedback I have received has been incorporated. Is it okay like
this?
Below is again the latest iteration of the
On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>
> Joseph Myers writes:
>
>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I didn't know about the workflow. Do you think I should dike the
>>> `--strip-sums` option out again then?
>>
>> I don't see any use for such an option. A
Joseph Myers writes:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>
>> Ok, I didn't know about the workflow. Do you think I should dike the
>> `--strip-sums` option out again then?
>
> I don't see any use for such an option. Anyone changing the versions
> should always have a copy of the new
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
> Ok, I didn't know about the workflow. Do you think I should dike the
> `--strip-sums` option out again then?
I don't see any use for such an option. Anyone changing the versions
should always have a copy of the new tarball (obtained securely if
po
Joseph Myers writes:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>
>> be cleaner to only include those checksums that are actually needed. On
>> the other hand, it means an increased maintenance burden each time the
>> version of the dependency is changed. In order to mitigate this and
>
> I
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
> be cleaner to only include those checksums that are actually needed. On
> the other hand, it means an increased maintenance burden each time the
> version of the dependency is changed. In order to mitigate this and
I really don't see it as an increa
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>>
>>> I have made an actual diff now, containing also the checksum files.
>>> I
>>
>> I don't think checksums of lots of miscellaneous files should be
>> included, just t
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>
>> I have made an actual diff now, containing also the checksum files. I
>
> I don't think checksums of lots of miscellaneous files should be included,
> just the checksums for those files the cur
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
> I have made an actual diff now, containing also the checksum files. I
I don't think checksums of lots of miscellaneous files should be included,
just the checksums for those files the current script will actually use.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@cod
Joseph Myers writes:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>
>> gmp='gmp-4.3.2.tar.bz2'
>> mpfr='mpfr-2.4.2.tar.bz2'
>> mpc='mpc-0.8.1.tar.gz'
>> isl='isl-0.15.tar.bz2'
>
> These are not the versions used in the current script (given which,
> presumably you need to check for any other cha
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
> gmp='gmp-4.3.2.tar.bz2'
> mpfr='mpfr-2.4.2.tar.bz2'
> mpc='mpc-0.8.1.tar.gz'
> isl='isl-0.15.tar.bz2'
These are not the versions used in the current script (given which,
presumably you need to check for any other changes to the script since you
star
On Sep 11, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>
> There is a long-standing
> [bug report](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439)
> pointing out that the `download_prerequisites` script doesn't verify the
> integrity of the packages it downloads.
I like the script.
There is a long-standing
[bug report](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439)
pointing out that the `download_prerequisites` script doesn't verify the
integrity of the packages it downloads. The original bug report is only
concerned about stability but for me, this is first and foremos
17 matches
Mail list logo
